Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday July 17 2020, @05:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the calling-all-crackpots dept.

This interview with the authors describes a fascinating book that gives facts about cosmology in a combined education and the challenges to the people who can't quite believe in the conclusions scientists draw. Looks neat.

Despite having the world's knowledge at our fingertips, we live in a time of great scientific illiteracy. Disinformation is rampant about vaccines, climate change and even pandemics like Covid-19. But it gets even trickier when talking about the origins of life, the universe, and everything. Some of the facts we often hear about the cosmos are so absurd to imagine — they can almost feel like a religious dogma.

Of course, cosmic theories are based on mountains of data, not whimsical guesses. Yet, how do scientists really know a supermassive black hole is at the center of the Milky Way? How do scientists know distant nebulae are (sometimes) made of hydrogen clouds? How do scientists know 14 billion years ago there was a massive explosion of matter and energy that formed everything in our universe?

We hear these claims often, but most of us aren't able to examine the gritty details behind a scientific theory. Two astronomers get at this problem in the new book The Cosmic Revolutionary's Handbook: Or, How To Beat The Big Bang (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

[...] But Handbook goes one step further, explaining the scientific process in detail, so if you don't accept the mainstream Big Bang theory, you can create your own. Yes, [authors] Barnes and Lewis encourage you to take on the intellectual giants of cosmology — Einstein, Hawking, and all the rest — by taking this data and interpreting your own hypothesis.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday July 18 2020, @01:51PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday July 18 2020, @01:51PM (#1023364) Journal

    It's just a hack, and a very extreme one at that.

    What's supposed to be wrong with hacks? They help illuminate the problem. Any better model will need to have an explanation for cosmic inflation, either modeling the inflation or explaining why it's actually some other effect.

    I do not think a *bad* theory is better than no theory because *bad* theories become inertially sustaining.

    What bad theory? Big Bang Theory to the contrary is a good theory.

    By contrast like you mention there are certain issues with quantum gravity preventing a real unification of the micro (quantum mechanics) and the macro (relativity) world. But this is matter is largely just going to be one of refinement.

    Unless, of course, it's not going to be a matter of refinement. Given how very different general relativity and quantum mechanics are, I think we'll need more than mere refinement to get there.