Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Saturday July 18 2020, @11:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the micro$oft-please-stop-breaking-my-world-view dept.

Michael Larabel writes in Phoronix about Microsoft's new open-source process monitor for Linux:

Microsoft's newest open-source Linux software is ProcMon for Linux, a rewritten and re-imagined version of its Processor Monitor found on Windows within their Sysinternals suite.
 
Microsoft's ProcMon tool is a C++-written, open-source process monitor for Linux that makes it convenient to trace system call activity. This ProcMon Linux version is open-source under an MIT license.
 
Microsoft released the source code to their ProcMon Linux version on Thursday and is marked as a 1.0 preview release. Microsoft is also making available a Debian/Ubuntu package of this preview build.

The Phoronix article includes a gif demonstrating ProcMon. To my amateur eyes, this looks like htop without the resource monitoring and instead has some stack tracing capabilities. Has anybody given Microsoft's ProcMon a test drive? What are your thoughts?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 19 2020, @01:08AM (6 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 19 2020, @01:08AM (#1023581) Journal

    Now that you ask - yes there is something wrong with them. They don't have Microsoft's official stamp of approval.

    I'm suspicious of anything that Microsoft wants to install on a Linux machine. Didn't Poettering work for Microsoft before he started systemdestroying Linux?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @02:57AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @02:57AM (#1023611)

    The work history section of Pottering's wikipedia page does not mention Microsoft.

    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @03:09AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @03:09AM (#1023616)

      Use Wikipedia's history feature and you can see it in an earlier version, likely changed so as not to damage his Linux creds. It's the period that now shows as "In federal prison for pedophilia".

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Marand on Sunday July 19 2020, @04:11AM (2 children)

    by Marand (1081) on Sunday July 19 2020, @04:11AM (#1023631) Journal

    Didn't Poettering work for Microsoft before he started systemdestroying Linux?

    You're probably thinking of GNOME creator Miguel de Icaza, who was a Microsoft fanboy from the start, worked an internship at MS early on, and was so enamoured with Microsoft's way of doing things that he brought both the registry [wikipedia.org] (deprecated now but its replacement [wikipedia.org] isn't particularly different) and .NET [wikipedia.org] to Linux as parts of the GNOME project. He's also been an advocate of Microsoft's OOXML format [slashdot.org] and, after decades of pro-Microsoft advocacy, finally got his wish and became an employee of Microsoft via their acquisition of Xamarin [microsoft.com], a company he created specifically to focus on spreading the use of .NET to non-Windows places like Android, iOS, and Linux.

    Like Poettering, his "contributions" to Linux are controversial and sometimes detrimental, though at least you can see that Poettering is pro-Linux even if his way of showing it is questionable. Miguel, on the other hand, is a long-time mac user [tirania.org] that has complained more than once about how horrible he thinks Linux is in comparison. Kind of ironic that the person that started GNOME has never given much of a shit about Linux. Says a lot about GNOME's way of doing things, really.

    • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @08:52AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @08:52AM (#1023664)
      I've always been fond of Midnight Commander [wikipedia.org], though.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @03:20PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @03:20PM (#1023742)

        there was once a ... norton commander, for like DOS? oh and ... laplink!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @01:18PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 19 2020, @01:18PM (#1023710)

    " Didn't Poettering work for Microsoft before he started systemdestroying Linux?"

    Redmondhat.