Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 8 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday July 24 2020, @09:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the counting-is-hard-when-it-counts dept.

With No Final Say, Trump Wants To Change Who Counts For Dividing Up Congress' Seats:

President Trump released a memorandum Tuesday that calls for an unprecedented change to the constitutionally mandated count of every person living in the country — the exclusion of unauthorized immigrants from the numbers used to divide up seats in Congress among the states.

The memo instructs Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who oversees the Commerce Department, to include in the legally required report of census results to the president "information permitting the President, to the extent practicable" to leave out the number of immigrants living in the U.S. without authorization from the apportionment count.

But the move by the president, who does not have final authority over the census, is more likely to spur legal challenges and political spectacle in the last months before this year's presidential election than a transformation of the once-a-decade head count, which has been disrupted by the coronavirus pandemic.

[...] Since the first U.S. census in 1790, both U.S. citizens and noncitizens — regardless of immigration status — have been included in the country's official population counts.

The fifth sentence of the Constitution specifies that "persons" residing in the states should be counted every 10 years to determine each state's share of seats in the House of Representatives. The 14th Amendment, which ended the counting of an enslaved person as "three fifths" of a free person, goes further to require the counting of the "whole number of persons in each state."

It is Congress — not the president — that Article 1, Section 2 of the country's founding document empowers to carry out the "actual enumeration" of the country's population in "such manner as they shall by law direct."

In Title 2 of the U.S. Code, Congress detailed its instructions for the president to report to lawmakers the tally of the "whole number of persons" living in each state for the reapportionment of House seats. In Title 13, Congress established additional key dates for the "tabulation of total population."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by vux984 on Friday July 24 2020, @05:37PM

    by vux984 (5045) on Friday July 24 2020, @05:37PM (#1025868)

    "I challenge everyone to do ctrl-f for "residing" and "reside"

    I notice in your own post the 2nd amendment contains "inhabitatants" which is synonymous with "residents"; neither of which would be caught by your ctrl-f so one should probably read rather than keyword search.
    I'd also argue it is pretty clear that the "in" in the 14th should be interpreted as to mean "inhabiting" from the context.

    "In other words, if you are citizen and lost your right to vote and are counted in the census, you are NOT included in the numbers used to allot Federal seats."

    Wow you REALLY got Section 2 wrong, and the pieces you excluded is extremely critical. What section 2 is saying is that that states aren't allowed to capriciously restrict who eligible to vote, and the reduction in apportionment is their punishment. For example, if a state were to pass a rule that you must own three houses and pass a loyalty-to-the-governor test to vote in a federal election, the 14th amendment says, ok... fine, but your representation in congress is going off a fucking cliff now. And it specifically carves out the exclusion for criminals and rebels because not letting them vote does NOT reduce the apportionment -- ie the 2nd amendment says... look no fucking around with who gets to vote or we'll take way your apportionment, but yes just to be clear: its OK to prevent criminals and rebels from voting, and that WON'T reduce your apportionment.

    So to paraphrase you:

    "So in the end, count however many people you want "in" your state, but when it comes to allotment of congressional seats -- you can count EVERYONE and get credit for them; unless you FUCK with elgible voters who aren't criminals or rebels. You do that, and we'll fuck with your apportionment, you done been warned."

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2