Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday July 28 2020, @09:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the positive-side-effect dept.

U.S. agency: Pandemic masks thwarting face recognition tech:

Having a tough time recognizing your neighbors behind their pandemic masks? Computers are finding it more difficult, too.

A preliminary study published by a U.S. agency on Monday found that even the best commercial facial recognition systems have error rates as high as 50% when trying to identify masked faces.

The mask problem is why Apple earlier this year made it easier for iPhone owners to unlock their phones without Face ID. It could also be thwarting attempts by authorities to identify individual people at Black Lives Matter protests and other gatherings.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology says it is launching an investigation to better understand how facial recognition performs on covered faces. Its preliminary study examined only those algorithms created before the pandemic, but its next step is to look at how accuracy could improve as commercial providers adapt their technology to an era when so many people are wearing masks.

Some companies, including those that work with law enforcement, have tried to tailor their face-scanning algorithms to focus on people's eyes and eyebrows.

NIST, which is a part of the Commerce Department, is working with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Department of Homeland Security's science office to study the problem.

Aww, I feel so bad for the little guy! Perhaps we can help out by training up a neural net to correlate masked and unmasked photos.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 29 2020, @06:22AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 29 2020, @06:22AM (#1028025)

    Maybe, you just maybe, the system is so corrupt with vested interest that folks are willing to put their lives on the line than believe the facts coming out of those source. As in its not the facts but where its coming from that they're against?

    Everything can be bought with enough money and power nowadays.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by PiMuNu on Wednesday July 29 2020, @07:41AM

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Wednesday July 29 2020, @07:41AM (#1028035)

    > As in its not the facts but where its coming from that they're against?

    You are perfectly correct - but there is a missing step; that is to do a little digging and make a reasonable decision as to whether the information presented is true or false. That step is the distinction between conspiracy nutjobs and rational folk.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Opportunist on Wednesday July 29 2020, @07:44AM (1 child)

    by Opportunist (5545) on Wednesday July 29 2020, @07:44AM (#1028036)

    That makes zero sense. Imagine someone you know to be a (insert bad person du jour here) telling you that a room is full of Sarin gas and you should probably better not go inside, and when you look through the window you can already see a couple dead people on the floor. Would you go in because it was a (bad person du jour) giving you that info?

    The validity of information is independent of the source.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 30 2020, @03:26PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 30 2020, @03:26PM (#1028691)

      No, it's not. Never heard "there boy who cried wolf"?