Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday July 29 2020, @06:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the There-are-two-eyes-in-"Rite-Aid" dept.

Reuters: Rite Aid monitored customers using facial recognition cameras

Over about eight years, the American drugstore chain Rite Aid Corp quietly added facial recognition systems to 200 stores across the United States, in one of the largest rollouts of such technology among retailers in the country, a Reuters investigation found.

In the hearts of New York and metro Los Angeles, Rite Aid deployed the technology in largely lower-income, non-white neighborhoods, according to a Reuters analysis. And for more than a year, the retailer used state-of-the-art facial recognition technology from a company with links to China and its authoritarian government.

In telephone and email exchanges with Reuters since February, Rite Aid confirmed the existence and breadth of its facial recognition program. The retailer defended the technology's use, saying it had nothing to do with race and was intended to deter theft and protect staff and customers from violence. Reuters found no evidence that Rite Aid's data was sent to China.

Last week, however, after Reuters sent its findings to the retailer, Rite Aid said it had quit using its facial recognition software. It later said all the cameras had been turned off.

It's a very long article:

Reuters pieced together how the company's initiative evolved, how the software has been used and how a recent vendor was linked to China, drawing on thousands of pages of internal documents from Rite Aid and its suppliers, as well as direct observations during store visits by Reuters journalists and interviews with more than 40 people familiar with the systems' deployment.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by mrpg on Wednesday July 29 2020, @10:40PM (2 children)

    by mrpg (5708) Subscriber Badge <{mrpg} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Wednesday July 29 2020, @10:40PM (#1028334) Homepage

    I prefer this, I feel included. The original ignored the existence of latin people.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 30 2020, @01:04AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 30 2020, @01:04AM (#1028401)

    Latin people??? Romanes eunt domus!

  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Thursday July 30 2020, @02:56PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Thursday July 30 2020, @02:56PM (#1028663)

    Either version will behave the same way if the value is neither "white" nor "black"; you just save the extra jump in the "black" case.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"