Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday August 03 2020, @09:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the worthy-of-J-Edgar-Hoover dept.

Homeland Security Shuts Down 'Intelligence' Reports on Journalists:

The acting secretary of homeland security said on Friday that he had shut down an intelligence examination of the work of reporters covering the government's response to protests in Portland, Ore., beginning an investigation into what he suggested was an infringement on First Amendment rights.

[...] The acting secretary, Chad F. Wolf, "is committed to ensuring that all D.H.S. personnel uphold the principles of professionalism, impartiality and respect for civil rights and civil liberties, particularly as it relates to the exercise of First Amendment rights," said Alexei Woltornist, the department's spokesman.

The intelligence office issued three "open-source intelligence reports" in the past week that summarized the Twitter posts of a Times reporter and the editor in chief for the blog Lawfare, noting that they had published leaked unclassified documents.

Mr. Wolf ordered the intelligence arm to "immediately discontinue collecting information involving members of the press" once he found out about the practice, Mr. Woltornist said.

[...] "The Department of Homeland Security has acknowledged that its intelligence reporting system, designed to combat terrorism, has instead been misused to target journalists who were reporting on the controversial activities of federal law enforcement officers," she said in a statement. "It is imperative that D.H.S.'s investigation determines how this happened and ensures it does not happen again."

[...] "If you're allowed to do this, what else are you allowed to do? If you're allowed to keep tabs on and file reports about my social media," he added, "are you allowed to gather all the other public record material that exists about me and create a dossier?"

The American Civil Liberties Union denounced the agency's actions on Friday, saying they were part of a larger pattern.

"Under Wolf's leadership, D.H.S. was caught just last year unconstitutionally targeting and building dossiers on journalists reporting on conditions at the border," the group's senior legislative counsel, Neema Signh Guliani, said in a statement. "For weeks, D.H.S. agents have been deliberately and brutally attacking journalists covering the Portland protests. And documents show that D.H.S. intelligence arm appears to be claiming authority it does not have. This administration's assault on the First Amendment continues to escalate."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday August 04 2020, @12:18AM (7 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 04 2020, @12:18AM (#1031021) Journal

    I'll disagree, to some extent, with your characterization. The ACLU has always been a bunch of crazies, who don't much like government. I really think they are closet anarchists. Back in the day, they were right two times out of three, then it went to one time out of three, then one time out of four.

    They still get something right often enough to be worth paying attention to. But they are slipping toward the Dark Side. I do believe that Darth Vader works in one of their back offices, away from the light of day.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Thexalon on Tuesday August 04 2020, @01:30PM (6 children)

    by Thexalon (636) on Tuesday August 04 2020, @01:30PM (#1031222)

    The ACLU are die-hard supporters of the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments in particular.

    They started out defending communists, union organizers, and other left-wing types in court, because nobody else would and the government was routinely arresting those sorts for saying things that major businesses didn't like.

    They've been consistent about those positions, famously defending the American Nazi Party's right to march.

    If you've decided that the rights of citizens to speak their mind without being searched and harassed and arrested by the government is partisan hackery, then that says something about where you stand on the whole democracy thing.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @01:44PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @01:44PM (#1031227)

      Your examples are over 40 years past.

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday August 04 2020, @06:24PM (4 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 04 2020, @06:24PM (#1031335) Journal

      Democracy. There are times when I think it might be nice to live in a democracy. Hey, it would be nice to try it once, so that I knew what it was like. Alas, all US citizens live in a REPUBLIC. Not a democracy, but a repupblic.

      • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Tuesday August 04 2020, @06:42PM (3 children)

        by Thexalon (636) on Tuesday August 04 2020, @06:42PM (#1031345)

        Regardless of "democracy" versus "republic", if you don't believe that citizens should have the right to say what they would like to about the government without that government being able to use violence to stop them, then what you're a backer of is not a democracy or a republic, but instead a dictatorship or oligarchy.

        To put it in the form of a joke Ronald Reagan told back in the 80's:
        American: "I can go up to the White House and shout 'I don't like Reagan!'"
        Russian: "So? I can go up to the Kremlin and shout 'I don't like Reagan!'"

        --
        The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @10:04PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @10:04PM (#1031439)

          Runaway LIKES the fascism because it is hurting the people he doesn't like. That is why he puts forth such a naive rebuttal. There is no reaching him with logic, he is emotionally compromised so it will require someone who can engage him on a proper emotional level to make him see his hypocrisy. After that it will require constant reminders and a change from his breitbart/fox/whatever propaganda sources to keep him from devolving.

        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday August 05 2020, @01:13AM (1 child)

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 05 2020, @01:13AM (#1031513) Journal

          Thexalon doesn't know it, but he's hosting a party for 100 people in his house this evening. They are "mostly peaceful" partiers. A couple guys are expected to bring commercial grade fireworks, heavy duty lasers, maybe a couple of guns, and demolition tools. If Thexalon tries to prevent this party, does that make him a fascist?

          • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:11PM

            by Thexalon (636) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:11PM (#1031823)

            Hey, that sounds like a couple weekends ago out in my neighborhood, except for the "everybody at my place" part: Normally, it's different crews setting off the fireworks vs shooting a few rounds off vs playing with lasers. (Last weekend was rainy, otherwise it would have been similar.) And if they really want to demolish something, there are better targets around, really that would be much more fun.

            You scare really easily.

            --
            The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.