Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday August 04 2020, @01:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the I-use-Lynx,-you-insensitive-clod! dept.

Firefox Browser Use Drops As Mozilla's Worst Microsoft Edge Fears Come True

Back in April, we reported that the Edge browser is quickly gaining market share now that Microsoft has transitioned from the EdgeHTML engine to the more widely used Chromium engine (which also underpins Google's Chrome browser). At the time, Edge slipped into the second-place slot for desktop web browsers, with a 7.59 percent share of the market. This dropped Mozilla's Firefox – which has long been the second-place browser behind Chrome – into third place.

Now, at the start of August, we're getting some fresh numbers in for the desktop browser market, and things aren't looking good for Mozilla. Microsoft increased its share of the browser market from 8.07 percent in June to 8.46 percent in July. Likewise, Firefox fell from 7.58 percent to 7.27 percent according to NetMarketShare.

[...] As for Mozilla, the company wasn't too happy when Microsoft first announced that it was going to use Chromium for Edge way back in December 2018. Mozilla's Chris Beard at the time accused Microsoft of "giving up" by abandoning EdgeHTML in favor of Chromium. "Microsoft's decision gives Google more ability to single-handedly decide what possibilities are available to each one of us," said Beard at the time. "We compete with Google because the health of the internet and online life depend on competition and choice."

[...] Microsoft developer Kenneth Auchenberg fought back the following January, writing, "Thought: It's time for Mozilla to get down from their philosophical ivory tower. The web is dominated by Chromium, if they really *cared* about the web they would be contributing instead of building a parallel universe that's used by less than 5 percent."

Is the browser monoculture inevitable or will Firefox hang in there?

Previously:


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday August 04 2020, @03:45AM (5 children)

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday August 04 2020, @03:45AM (#1031118)

    Which is why they offer a Snap

    Oh? Another reason to not bother then.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1) by petecox on Tuesday August 04 2020, @03:56AM (4 children)

    by petecox (3228) on Tuesday August 04 2020, @03:56AM (#1031123)

    I just looked at their download page. It assumed I wanted the amd64 .deb but listed rpm & snap as options.

    If either of us could be bothered we'd complain to Opera! :) They need to explicitly say what OS release they support or loosen up their versioning requirements. e.g. libABC 25.3 or higher instead of libABC 25.3.1

    • (Score: 4, Touché) by Arik on Tuesday August 04 2020, @05:47AM (3 children)

      by Arik (4543) on Tuesday August 04 2020, @05:47AM (#1031145) Journal
      Or, you know, they could release the source and leave the packaging to people that know how to do it.

      Nah, that'd be craaaaazy.
      --
      If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:48PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:48PM (#1031376)

        The problem is the bugs. They test it with certain version of a library and don't want to have people saying "oh it doesn't work on linux" because some package maintainer understandably got busy in his life.

        I mean, browser is not easy.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:56PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:56PM (#1031978)

        The problem of releasing the source is that people could see those backdoors and build-in tracking... you do not want to know about those, right!

        • (Score: 1) by MIRV888 on Thursday August 13 2020, @09:32AM

          by MIRV888 (11376) on Thursday August 13 2020, @09:32AM (#1036072)

          There's no free lunch. Open source keeps it honest. Better code is better code. Would you rather be lied to about your software's vulnerability?
          We are chasing the perfect mousetrap.