Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday August 04 2020, @06:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the bee-nice-to-pollinators dept.

Decline of bees, other pollinators threatens US crop yields: Largest study of its kind highlights risk to global food security:

Most of the world's crops depend on honeybees and wild bees for pollination, so declines in both managed and wild bee populations raise concerns about food security, notes the study in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

"We found that many crops are pollination-limited, meaning crop production would be higher if crop flowers received more pollination. We also found that honey bees and wild bees provided similar amounts of pollination overall," said senior author Rachael Winfree, a professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources in the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences at Rutgers University-New Brunswick. "Managing habitat for native bee species and/or stocking more honey bees would boost pollination levels and could increase crop production."

Pollination by wild and managed insects is critical for most crops, including those providing essential micronutrients, and is essential for food security, the study notes. In the U.S., the production of crops that depend on pollinators generates more than $50 billion a year. According to recent evidence, European honey bees (Apis mellifera) and some native wild bee species are in decline.

Journal Reference:
Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators, Proceedings of the Royal Society B (DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0922)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:04PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:04PM (#1031353)

    We’ve seen this before , nobody will go hungry
    https://capx.co/fifty-years-on-the-population-bomb-is-as-wrong-as-ever/ [capx.co]

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Disagree=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Disagree' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:30PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:30PM (#1031364)

    Hundreds of millions of people on Earth are already hungry. Many of them of downright starving.

    Fucking first-world-centric privileged little assholes.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:36PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:36PM (#1031370)

      That is mostly a problem of logistics and local governments and corruption. The secondary issue is the scare mongering around GMO.

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday August 05 2020, @04:52AM (1 child)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 05 2020, @04:52AM (#1031567) Journal

      You might want citations for the "hundreds of millions" part. I have this (possibly unwarranted) impression that things are going pretty well at the moment. Let me search for "droughts" . . .

      Guess you're right - https://www.worldvision.org/hunger-news-stories/africa-hunger-famine-facts [worldvision.org]

      That article claims 257 million people in Africa are going hungry. I will note that charitable organizations have at least a minor tendency to exaggerate problems, so maybe it's only 237 million?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:25PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:25PM (#1031992)

        Charitable organizations are the cause of the problem... What better way to destabilize a continent and prep it for corporations to seize control than to put the local farmers out of work and keep the people poor and dependent on foreign aid?

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by PinkyGigglebrain on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:54PM (1 child)

    by PinkyGigglebrain (4458) on Tuesday August 04 2020, @07:54PM (#1031379)

    That book was based on assumptions that food production would be outstripped by population growth . New varieties of plants and farming methods increased the yields over the years in ways the book's author did not account for.

    The thing to keep in mind with the decline in honey bees and other pollinators is that a fair percentage of food crops must be pollinated to produce anything, regardless of what sort of yield it is theoretically capable of producing under "ideal" conditions. Most fruit, nut, legumes, and other crops rely on some kind of insect to pollinate them. Less pollinators, less pollinated flowers, less food produced.

    " ... nobody will go hungry

    Contrary to what you might have been lead to believe there are people going hungry in the USA, and people starving to death in many parts of the world. There is enough food to feed everyone IF it gets distributed correctly, but since it isn't most people rely on locally grown foods to survive, and anything that reduces that locally produced food is something to be concerned about.

    --
    "Beware those who would deny you Knowledge, For in their hearts they dream themselves your Master."
    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday August 05 2020, @12:32AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 05 2020, @12:32AM (#1031501) Journal

      There is enough food to feed everyone IF it gets distributed correctly

      Well, that's indeed a big "if", especially when coupled with "correctly".
      E.g. what does it mean "correctly" in, say, the conditions of an Ebola pandemic?

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford