Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday August 06 2020, @03:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the doing-time dept.

Ex-Googler Levandowski gets 18 months in prison for trade-secret theft:

Ex-Google engineer Anthony Levandowski yesterday was sentenced to 18 months in prison following his March guilty plea for stealing a confidential document related to Google's self-driving technology.

Levandowski's lawyers last week asked a judge in US District Court for the Northern District of California to let him off without any prison time, arguing that a year of home confinement, a fine, restitution, and community service would be sufficient punishment. The federal government asked for a 27-month prison sentence.

While handing down the 18-month sentence, US District Judge William Alsup said that a sentence without imprisonment would give "a green light to every future brilliant engineer to steal trade secrets," according to a Reuters report. Levandowski was originally charged with 33 counts of stealing trade secrets by downloading thousands of documents to his personal laptop in December 2015 shortly before he left Google to work on his startup, Otto, which was acquired by Uber for a reported $680 million in August 2016. In a plea deal, Levandowksi admitted to stealing one document called "Chauffeur TL weekly updates," which tracked the progress of Google's "Project Chauffeur" that later became Waymo. Prosecutors dropped the other charges.

Levandowski won't have to serve the sentence right away, as Alsup ruled that he can go to prison after the coronavirus pandemic subsides, according to Reuters and other news outlets.

Levandowski also must pay $756K to Waymo


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Thursday August 06 2020, @05:14PM (7 children)

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday August 06 2020, @05:14PM (#1032340) Journal
    He STOLE the documents. As in made copies and walked them out the door and over to Uber. Uber using them would be infringement.
    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:13PM (6 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:13PM (#1032377)

    Not familiar, but did he really make copies of documents and physically walk out the door with them?

    More likely, given today's work patterns, he copied the documents out of Google's servers via VPN into his home computer - where they legally resided until he terminated employment, then when he started working with Uber he shared them back via network to his new coworkers.

    His "theft" would then have amounted to not having scrubbed his home drives after termination and of course sharing sensitive bits therein later.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by barbara hudson on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:18PM (5 children)

      by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:18PM (#1032380) Journal
      He made copies at work onto a USB drive. He walked that USB drive to Uber. He was too stupid to realize that work computers leave evidence behind, as do server logs. When you walk out with data that isn't yours, it's theft. Uber, if they used it, is receiving stolen goods .
      --
      SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:23PM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:23PM (#1032382)

        a *copy* is not *theft*.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:38PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:38PM (#1032399)

          It's rather dishonest to conflate the two.

        • (Score: 3, Informative) by barbara hudson on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:44PM (1 child)

          by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:44PM (#1032405) Journal
          We're not talking copyright violation. Stop conflating that with actual theft of trade secrets, which is criminal.

          Next you'll be arguing that the Canadian Navy guy who was found guilty of passing secrets to foreign powers should have only been found guilty of copyright infringement and not theft of government secrets.

          --
          SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @10:15PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @10:15PM (#1032533)

            Without knowing what case you are blathering about, I'd bet that he was actually found guilty of espionage.

      • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:58PM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday August 06 2020, @06:58PM (#1032418)

        So, it sounds like these were documents he didn't require access to as part of his normal work duties.

        Doesn't matter, really, once you've triggered the corporate lawyers and they think you are a target worth destroying, they're coming for you no matter what.

        --
        🌻🌻 [google.com]