Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday August 09 2020, @05:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the like-swiss-cheese dept.

New Windows Print Spooler Zero-Day Flaws Harken Back to Stuxnet:

Ten years after the game-changing Stuxnet attack was first discovered, a Windows printer program it exploited has been found to contain additional dangerous zero-day flaws that could allow an attacker to gain a foothold in the network as a privileged user.

The researchers who discovered the new flaws in Microsoft's ubiquitous Windows Print Spooler service say they wanted to see if there still was a way to game Print Spooler for a Stuxnet 2.0-style attack 10 years after the first known cyberweapon attack was unearthed. "We started digging in, looking at the original Stuxnet propagation, and then we found out there were problems. ... We decided to take the Spooler service to the next level, and eventually we found it was not fully patched," explains Tomer Bar, research team leader at Safe Breach, who along with his colleague Peleg Hadar found the flaws that they plan to detail today at Black Hat USA.

Bar and Hadar found three zero-day vulnerabilities in the 20-year-old Windows Print Spooler program, which serves as the interface between a printer and the Windows operating system, loading the print driver, setting up print jobs, and printing. The new, post-Stuxnet vulns include a memory corruption bug that could be used to wage a denial-of-service (DoS) attack and two local privilege escalation bugs. One of the local privilege escalation flaws was patched by Microsoft in May (CVE-2020-1048), but Bar and Hadar found another similar flaw that bypasses that patch. All three vulnerabilities affect all versions of the Windows operating system.

"They're using the same function [as Stuxnet did] but with a little twist," Bar says of the two local privilege-escalation zero-days.

While Stuxnet used a Print Spooler exploit to gain remote access, the local vulnerability found by Bar and Hadar could allow any user to gain the highest privileges on the machine — either as a malicious insider who has physical access to the machine or via an existing remote-access foothold previously obtained by an attacker.

Hadar says while Microsoft's patch for the Stuxnet vulnerability (MS10-061) fixed the remote-attack hole, it didn't address the local privilege-escalation holes. "That's what we focused on and were able to exploit," he says. They found the flaws using good old-fashioned reverse engineering and fuzzing techniques.

Exploiting the flaws is fairly simple, too, the researchers say. They were able to employ PowerShell commands to exploit the vulns.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2020, @07:28PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2020, @07:28PM (#1033968)

    Minesweeper cheats. The first box you choose is never a mine.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2020, @04:54PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2020, @04:54PM (#1034391)

    I've always wondered how they did that, did they have several boards queued up and just cycle through them in that instant to find the first that isn't a mine? Or do they develop a map with one empty slot and just put that empty in wherever you click*.

    For instance: a 10x10 map has 99 spaces defined, if you click on the 34th spot, 1-33 are placed as normal, but 34-99 are paced in 35-100? This seems the most likely solution now that I have thought more about it.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2020, @08:21PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2020, @08:21PM (#1034500)

      When I originally analyzed Minesweeper on Windows, my analysis showed that when it is drawing the board, it randomly selects a layout to use. Once you made a click, it would check if it was the first move, if not it would do the normal routine. If it was the first move, a special routine was activated and it checks if the tile is a mine or not. If it wasn't, it just marked that the first move had been made and proceeded to use the normal algorithm for revealing tiles. If it was a mine, it marked that the first move was made, then randomly selects one of the blank tiles, adds that tile to the mine set, added the clicked tile to the empty set, and then used the normal algorithm for revealing tiles.

      Newer versions use a different algorithm that is closer to your original guess.