Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday August 11 2020, @03:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the as-the-bitcoin-turns dept.

The quest to liberate $300,000 of bitcoin from an old ZIP file:

In October, Michael Stay got a weird message on LinkedIn. A total stranger had lost access to his bitcoin private keys—and wanted Stay's help getting his $300,000 back.

It wasn't a total surprise that The Guy, as Stay calls him, had found the former Google security engineer. Nineteen years ago, Stay published a paper detailing a technique for breaking into encrypted zip files. The Guy had bought around $10,000 worth of bitcoin in January 2016, well before the boom. He had encrypted the private keys in a zip file and had forgotten the password. He was hoping Stay could help him break in.

In a talk at the Defcon security conference this week, Stay details the epic attempt that ensued.

[...] "If we find the password successfully, I will thank you," The Guy wrote with a smiley face. After an initial analysis, Stay estimated that he would need to charge $100,000 to break into the file. The Guy took the deal. After all, he'd still be turning quite the profit.

[...] That's partly why the work was priced so high. Newer generations of zip programs use the established and robust cryptographic standard AES, but outdated versions—like the one used in The Guy's case—use Zip 2.0 Legacy encryption that can often be cracked. The degree of difficulty depends on how it's implemented, though. "It's one thing to say something is broken, but actually breaking it is a whole different ball of wax," says Johns Hopkins University cryptographer Matthew Green.

From a massive pool of passwords and encryption keys, Stay was able to narrow it down to something on the order of quintillions.

[...] By February, four months after that first LinkedIn message, they queued it all up and started the attack.

That initial attempt took 10 days to run... and did not work. Further sleuthing finally uncovered a bug. They were, ultimately, able to successfully extract the contents.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Tuesday August 11 2020, @06:17PM (1 child)

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Tuesday August 11 2020, @06:17PM (#1035068) Journal
    Turns out the original poster made a typi^Wtypa^Wmistake. I thought it might be some sort of hidden puzzle. Now I'm bummed out. :-(
    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Wednesday August 12 2020, @02:21AM

    by RS3 (6367) on Wednesday August 12 2020, @02:21AM (#1035356)

    Bummed out? When I first saw your analysis I thought "makes sense" and "another math thing beyond me". Many of life's great innovations have been stumbled upon, or at least motivated by unintended circumstances (mistakes?). Now you just need to apply for a math research grant and show us how it's done. :)

    It may help to work on moving a decimal point, uh, partially. You know, 0.4 places and such. You'll figure it out.