'Bullying' Apple fights couple over pear logo
When Natalie Monson started her food blog 11 years ago, she didn't expect to end up embroiled in a fight with the world's most valuable company.
But the US small business owner is now battling Apple for the right to use a pear in the logo on her recipe app.
In a patent filing, Apple said the image was too similar to its own logo and would hurt its brand.
Ms Monson says the tech giant is simply "bullying" and she feels a "moral obligation" to fight back.
More than 43,000 people have already signed the petition she and her husband Russ, owners of the Super Healthy Kids website, created last week to try to pressure the company to back down.
Also At:
Apple wants this recipe app to stop using a pear in its logo
Apple object to Prepear logo trademark, 'terrifying' small business owners
Apple vs Prepear: Besides Pear, There are Atleast 10 Other Companies Using Fruit Logos, Will Apple Come After Them Too?
Apple objects to trademark registration application of a recipe app; Here's why
(Score: 5, Informative) by maxwell demon on Wednesday August 12 2020, @12:42PM (19 children)
Anyone who confuses the two logos must be visually impaired.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by takyon on Wednesday August 12 2020, @12:57PM (2 children)
You don't have LawyerVision.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2020, @01:12PM (1 child)
Is that like beer googles for the reality distortion field?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday August 12 2020, @01:26PM
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Wednesday August 12 2020, @01:14PM (7 children)
Yes but that can work to bolster Apple's case, because in fact some people are visually impaired. Isn't the legal system and its lawyers wonderful? (that was sarcasm)
(Score: 2, Interesting) by petecox on Wednesday August 12 2020, @01:19PM
Their slogan is Think Different, not See Different.
Bring back the rainbow logo.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by RS3 on Wednesday August 12 2020, @01:28PM (5 children)
I amend my comment: I hadn't seen the "Prepear" logo when I wrote previous post. (What, read TFA? _AND_ links? Too early in the day...)
I'd imagined a black silhouette of a pear, with stem, and a bite. It's nothing like Apple's logo: https://www.instagram.com/p/CDmcFEInZK7/ [instagram.com]
This case IS absurd and frivolous at best. It almost seems like a joke of some kind. It shows the arrogance of such huge wealthy companies. "Prepear" should countersue- certainly for frivolous lawsuit and intimidation. The judge might even award that without Prepear's motion or petition.
Hopefully the "Streisand Effect" will help Prepear and their business.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 12 2020, @01:42PM (4 children)
Well... if I had to guess, I'd say that Apple feels compelled to "actively defend" its trademark in order to forestall any claims of abandonment, and this may be the closest thing they could find to infringement this month.
They may "actively defend" against this terrifying existential threat to their business for a month or two, then quietly settle out of court with the offender for terms agreeable to both parties. It may actually become a windfall for the small business.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2020, @03:30PM
This article [dailymail.co.uk] says they've already had to lay off someone because of legal fees. I wonder if the poor bastard will get his/her job back when the dust settles. Apple should be burnt badly for this shit.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by vux984 on Wednesday August 12 2020, @08:39PM (2 children)
"I'd say that Apple feels compelled to "actively defend" its trademark in order to forestall any claims of abandonment,"
No. The trillion dollar company doesn't actually need to sue a recipe app with a fruit themed logo to convince the court that it hasn't abandoned it's most prominently marketed and displayed trademark.
Its more likely that apple's legal team found a flimsy excuse to issue some more billable hours to their trillion dollar sugar daddy. That's why these things really happen.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 12 2020, @09:11PM (1 child)
I started work at a company on the same day as their new IP attorney. Over the next 16 months, this IP attorney was used for his political contacts and did _zero_ IP work, no new patent applications were processed, etc. Management was distracted chasing something shinier. One day it was brought to the CEOs attention that we have only gotten 9 patents issued in the previous 12 months while our similarly sized competitors have gotten 73. Being an old high school quarterback, the CEO asked around the room, High School football coach style: "do you know what that means? DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS??? - crickets - IT MEANS.... WE'RE 64 BEHIND!!! now go get us some PATENTS, double the bonuses, hire outside legal help, GO GO GO GO GO!"
My point being, it may be even dumber than the first order cynicism you find in Dilbert, there are some truly idiotic things that drive these actions. A common idiotic driver is arbitrary metrics where someone at some relatively high level in the organization passes a decree like: "there will be a minimum of two domestic and two international trademark defense actions diligently pursued per 12 months." And, you bring up billing and budget... since the department is likely on fixed retainer, it is in their interests to find the easiest pushover targets possible while meeting the decrees, and PrePair would seem to fit the "pushover" profile quite well.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 2) by MostCynical on Thursday August 13 2020, @11:50PM
where is the "+1 insightfully depressing" mod...
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2020, @01:17PM
How d'ya like dem apples? [php.net]
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2020, @02:05PM
You're
holdingseeing the logo wrong. It must take real courage to weaponize lawyers without also creating negative PR nightmares at the same time. Oh well, I guess Apple has enough "2 Trillion Fuck You Dollars" to not give a damn.(Score: 3, Touché) by FatPhil on Wednesday August 12 2020, @02:46PM (5 children)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Wednesday August 12 2020, @09:54PM (4 children)
> As someone who is visually impeared...
I see what you did there.
(Score: 3, Funny) by driverless on Thursday August 13 2020, @07:39AM (2 children)
Yeah, he finally grew a pear.
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Thursday August 13 2020, @01:34PM (1 child)
That was tareable.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 16 2020, @10:31AM
No it's nut!
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday August 14 2020, @08:09AM
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves