Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday August 12 2020, @12:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the fruit-fight dept.

'Bullying' Apple fights couple over pear logo

When Natalie Monson started her food blog 11 years ago, she didn't expect to end up embroiled in a fight with the world's most valuable company.

But the US small business owner is now battling Apple for the right to use a pear in the logo on her recipe app.

In a patent filing, Apple said the image was too similar to its own logo and would hurt its brand.

Ms Monson says the tech giant is simply "bullying" and she feels a "moral obligation" to fight back.

More than 43,000 people have already signed the petition she and her husband Russ, owners of the Super Healthy Kids website, created last week to try to pressure the company to back down.

Also At:
Apple wants this recipe app to stop using a pear in its logo
Apple object to Prepear logo trademark, 'terrifying' small business owners
Apple vs Prepear: Besides Pear, There are Atleast 10 Other Companies Using Fruit Logos, Will Apple Come After Them Too?
Apple objects to trademark registration application of a recipe app; Here's why


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday August 12 2020, @06:01PM (3 children)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday August 12 2020, @06:01PM (#1035671)

    But that's how you do it, so they have more money for you to steal if you win the court case

    Granted you should probably sue them before they can hire a team of 100 ninja lawyers

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 12 2020, @06:16PM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday August 12 2020, @06:16PM (#1035684)

    The law itself protects them, if they have been practicing the use of the logo openly for a long time, any previous "rights holders" who have not vigorously defended against infringement lose their rights via abandonment.

    That's all Apple is trying to do here: protect themselves against abandonment claims. There are all kinds of ways to do that, most of them involve lawyers and therefore are usually painful for everyone else involved.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2020, @10:06PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2020, @10:06PM (#1035827)

      But the point of a trademark is to be a unique mark to prevent confusion.

      If Apple claims any generic shape kind of like a round fruit, doesn't that make confusion in itself?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 13 2020, @03:37AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 13 2020, @03:37AM (#1035976)

      If that were the case, they should have taken action years ago. This logo has been in use for over a decade and now Apple decides they want to enforce their rights.