Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday August 15 2020, @03:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the that'll-sting dept.

Reuters

Amazon.com can be held liable like other traditional retailers for injuries from defective products sold via its sprawling e-commerce marketplace, a California state appeals court ruled on Thursday. The decision overturned a San Diego Superior Court ruling that the world's biggest online retailer was shielded from liability because it acted as a service provider, which is not subject to California product liability law.

In addition to selling its own inventory, Amazon allows third-party vendors to list products for sale on its website. Such vendors may store their products in Amazon's warehouses or ship them directly to customers.

The appeals court found that Amazon played a pivotal role in every step of plaintiff Angela Bolger's purchase of a replacement laptop battery from Amazon third-party seller Lenoge Technology HK Ltd, which was operating under the fictitious name "E-Life." Bolger alleged that the battery burst into flames while she balanced the laptop on her thighs, resulting in severe burns to her arms, legs and feet.

"Whatever term we use to describe Amazon's role, be it 'retailer,' 'distributor,' or merely 'facilitator,' it was pivotal in bringing the product here to the consumer," the appeals court held.
...

Both Pennsylvania's and Ohio's top courts are currently considering the issue, and federal appeals courts are weighing cases under California and Texas law.

Per aspera ad astra*... except the "aspera" part is taken by a third party, eh?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 15 2020, @04:54PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 15 2020, @04:54PM (#1037138)

    They'll just alter their T&C's to require sellers indemnify them.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Sunday August 16 2020, @04:27AM

    by Immerman (3985) on Sunday August 16 2020, @04:27AM (#1037356)

    That would be just fine - unless I'm mistaken in that case they're still legally responsible by default - the sellers simply agree to step in and assume responsibility as needed. And if the sellers are some fly-by-night outfit, that's not going to happen no matter what they signed. Bam! Someone is actually taking responsibility, and Amazon has incentive not act as a storefront for scammers.