Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday August 17 2020, @07:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the pushing-the-speed-limit dept.

Fastest star ever seen is moving at 8% the speed of light:

In the center of our galaxy, hundreds of stars closely orbit a supermassive black hole. Most of these stars have large enough orbits that their motion is described by Newtonian gravity and Kepler's laws of motion. But a few orbit so closely that their orbits can only be accurately described by Einstein's theory of general relativity. The star with the smallest orbit is known as S62. Its closest approach to the black hole has it moving more than 8% of light speed.

[...] For years, S2 was thought to be the closest star to SgrA*, but then S62 was discovered. As a team recently discovered, it's a star about twice as massive as the sun that orbits the black hole every 10 years. By their calculations, at the closest approach, its speed approaches 8% of the speed of light. That's so fast that time dilation comes into play. An hour at S62 would last about 100 Earth minutes.

Because of its proximity to SgrA*, S62 doesn't follow a Keplerian orbit. Rather than being a simple ellipse, it follows a spirograph motion by which its orbit precesses about 10 degrees with each cycle. This kind of relativistic precession was first observed with the orbit of Mercury, but only as a small effect.

Journal Reference:
Florian Peißker, Andreas Eckart, and Marzieh Parsa. S62 on a 9.9 yr Orbit around SgrA* - IOPscience, The Astrophysical Journal (2020) (DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5afd)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by https on Monday August 17 2020, @05:00PM (1 child)

    by https (5248) on Monday August 17 2020, @05:00PM (#1037912) Journal

    A bit more than 0.08c, it looks like. Else that star wouldn't be in orbit.

    --
    Offended and laughing about it.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday August 19 2020, @05:45AM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Wednesday August 19 2020, @05:45AM (#1038734) Homepage
    Only if you assume you've got no thrust. Of course, the rocket equation is a mathematical law, not merely a physical one, you can't cheat or optimise anything to get around it, so let's not consider how much fuel would be needed for that escape. Despite Gaark's protestations, fuelless thrust is still a thing of sci-fi only. (Yeah, so's jumping around space - probably the best answer to the question asked is "just jump back away again".)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves