Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 17 2020, @06:52PM   Printer-friendly

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/08/fcc-beats-cities-in-court-helping-carriers-avoid-2-billion-in-local-5g-fees/

The Federal Communications Commission has defeated dozens of cities in court, with judges ruling that the FCC can preempt local fees and regulations imposed on wireless carriers deploying 5G networks. The ruling is good news for AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

The FCC voted to preempt cities and towns in September 2018, saying the move would prevent local governments from charging wireless carriers about $2 billion worth of fees over five years related to deployment of wireless equipment such as small cells. That's less than 1 percent of the estimated $275 billion that the FCC said carriers would have to spend to deploy 5G small cells throughout the United States.

Cities promptly sued the FCC, but a ruling issued [Wednesday] by the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit went mostly in the FCC's favor. It wasn't a complete victory for the FCC, though, as judges overturned a portion of the FCC ruling that limited the kinds of aesthetic requirements cities and towns can impose on carrier deployments.

"The court rightly affirmed the FCC's efforts to ensure that infrastructure deployment critical to 5G... is not impeded by exorbitant fees imposed by state and local governments, undue delays in local permitting, and unreasonable barriers to pole access," FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said, calling the court decision "a massive victory for US leadership in 5G, our nation's economy, and American consumers."

On the losing side were localities including Portland, Oregon; San Francisco; New York City; Los Angeles; Boston; Chicago; Washington, DC; Las Vegas; Philadelphia; Austin, Texas; and others.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday August 18 2020, @02:14PM (1 child)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday August 18 2020, @02:14PM (#1038351) Journal

    Screw hotel and lodging. It's the insurance industry that needs fixing.

    And this wasn't intended to protect interstate commerce. It's to move the corruption upstairs, not to eliminate it. It gives private business eminent domain over city property. Very corrupt

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday August 19 2020, @02:31AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 19 2020, @02:31AM (#1038661) Journal

    Screw hotel and lodging. It's the insurance industry that needs fixing.

    You're not going to fix insurance by normalizing tax rates.

    And this wasn't intended to protect interstate commerce. It's to move the corruption upstairs, not to eliminate it.

    It still remains that there's less corruption afterwards. My interests happen to align with the ISPs in this matter.