SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
This Twist on Schrödinger’s Cat Paradox Has Major Implications for Quantum Theory:
What does it feel like to be both alive and dead?
That question irked and inspired Hungarian-American physicist Eugene Wigner in the 1960s. He was frustrated by the paradoxes arising from the vagaries of quantum mechanics—the theory governing the microscopic realm that suggests, among many other counterintuitive things, that until a quantum system is observed, it does not necessarily have definite properties. Take his fellow physicist Erwin Schrödinger's famous thought experiment in which a cat is trapped in a box with poison that will be released if a radioactive atom decays. Radioactivity is a quantum process, so before the box is opened, the story goes, the atom has both decayed and not decayed, leaving the unfortunate cat in limbo—a so-called superposition between life and death. But does the cat experience being in superposition?
Wigner sharpened the paradox by imagining a (human) friend of his shut in a lab, measuring a quantum system. He argued it was absurd to say his friend exists in a superposition of having seen and not seen a decay unless and until Wigner opens the lab door. "The 'Wigner's friend' thought experiment shows that things can become very weird if the observer is also observed," says Nora Tischler, a quantum physicist at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia.
Now Tischler and her colleagues have carried out a version of the Wigner's friend test. By combining the classic thought experiment with another quantum head-scratcher called entanglement—a phenomenon that links particles across vast distances—they have also derived a new theorem, which they claim puts the strongest constraints yet on the fundamental nature of reality. Their study, which appeared in Nature Physics on August 17, has implications for the role that consciousness might play in quantum physics—and even whether quantum theory must be replaced.
Journal Reference:
Kok-Wei Bong, Aníbal Utreras-Alarcón, Farzad Ghafari, et al. A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox, Nature Physics (DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 18 2020, @11:46PM
Some of these comments in this discussion of Schrödinger's Cat remind me of the story of "msscribe" who was both real and not real at the same time. You can go and search it up, there's an amazingly in-depth discussion of the history of "msscribe" on YouTube, but the essence of the story is a person who craved online attention created a fake persona "msscribe" and then created a bunch of other fake sock-puppet accounts which verbally attacked and threatened to sue the "msscribe" account as a way of stirring up controversy and gaining notoriety.
If I were the moderators of Soylent News, I'd be banning every IP address and account associated with any and all posts that may or may not be libellous, whether or not there's only one person or more than one person behind them all, as a way to pour cold water on the whole situation and make it clear that Soylent News is not their personal stage. There are a whole lot of crazies on the internet, and you don't want to encourage any of them to think of this place as their private playground.