Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Cities Sue Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, Claim They Owe Cable "Franchise Fees"

posted by Fnord666 on Friday August 21 2020, @09:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the declining-revenues dept.

Freeman writes:

Cities sue Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, claim they owe cable “franchise fees”:

Four cities in Indiana are suing Netflix and other video companies, claiming that online video providers and satellite-TV operators should have to pay the same franchise fees that cable companies pay for using local rights of way.

The lawsuit was filed against Netflix, Disney, Hulu, DirecTV, and Dish Network on August 4 in Indiana Commercial Court in Marion County. The cities of Indianapolis, Evansville, Valparaiso, and Fishers want the companies to pay the cable-franchise fees established in Indiana's Video Service Franchises (VSF) Act, which requires payments of 5 percent of gross revenue in each city.

Inspired by? Charter Can Charge Online Video Sites for Network Connections, Court Rules

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Cities Sue Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, Claim They Owe Cable "Franchise Fees" | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 15 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 5, Touché) by DeathMonkey on Friday August 21 2020, @04:10PM (1 child)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday August 21 2020, @04:10PM (#1039947) Journal

    Good thing Ajit Pai repealed Net Neutrality, eh?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Offtopic=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Touché=2, Total=5
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   5  

  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday August 21 2020, @10:01PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday August 21 2020, @10:01PM (#1040121)

    Back in the '90s, every local municipality piled taxes and fees on cellular phone traffic, politically the measures were popular because it was seen as a "luxury tax" - some places went so far as to try to tax any cellular phone traffic that passed through their county - shades of the silk road.

    In the '00s, I looked into the idea of buying some land in East Nebraska and building a windpower farm. Similar problems confronted that endeavor, not just in Nebraska. They call it "spinning fees" but, basically, it's a local shakedown to ensure that any energy development investment in the local area spreads some of that money around to the local governments.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]