Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 24 2020, @12:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the Yo-Ho-Ho-It's-Magic dept.

After Legal Win, What's Next for Magic Mushrooms?:

On August 4, Canada's Health Minister Patty Hajdu granted, by way of a Section 56 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, permission for four terminally-ill Canadians to consume psychedelic drugs. The decision comes after months of careful maneuvering by TheraPsil, a Canadian non-profit seeking to treat end-of-life distress with psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms.

Dr. Bruce Tobin, a B.C.-based psychotherapist and TheraPsil's founder and chair, called the decision a game-changer. "It will contribute a whole new class of pharmacological tools and resources to the profession," he said. "Those of us who have been veterans in the field of clinical psychology understand all too well that there's just a very wide range of patient cases that the state-of-the-art isn't up to treating very well."

While the current exemption applies only to the approved patients seeking treatment for end-of-life anxiety and depression, TheraPsil's ultimate goal is legalized clinical access to medical-grade psilocybin within Canada's existing public healthcare framework.

[...] So far, the most credible applications of psychedelic medicine appear in the therapeutic treatments foregrounded by groups like TheraPsil. In Oregon, voters will see statewide access to legalized psilocybin therapy as an item on the November ballot. The Yes On IP34 initiative is petitioning the Oregon Health Authority to create a licensing system that regulates the use of psilocybin by trained practitioners. The movement is spearheaded by Tom and Sheri Eckert, husband-and-wife therapists and founders of the Oregon Psilocybin Society. "Psilocybin therapy is not a panacea," says Sheri, "but it's pretty unique in its potential to address a spectrum of mental health issues like depression, anxiety, and some addictions."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sjames on Monday August 24 2020, @11:47PM (1 child)

    by sjames (2882) on Monday August 24 2020, @11:47PM (#1041394) Journal

    It's funny to me that many of the same people who recoil in horror at a law that you must wear a mask when in public for the duration of the pandemic or face a small fine are all-in for a law that you must abstain from hallucinogens in all contexts forever or spend years in prison, even if they might control suicide headaches or otherwise untreatable depression.

    More laws for thee but none for me.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday August 25 2020, @12:45AM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday August 25 2020, @12:45AM (#1041405)

    Legislating morality is a common christian thing.

    We decided to stop prosecuting homosexuals in the early 1980's and the christians told us it would soon be compulsory, but it is still not.

    We stopped prosecuting prostitutes (because why bother? It's not like prosecuting them reduced the demand) and the christians told us pimps would be recruiting your daughter at the school gate, but that didn't happen either.

    Now they're telling us that something 25% of the population admits to doing at least occasionaly will lead to a mental health crisis.

    Why would anyone believe them at this point?