Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday August 25 2020, @12:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the powerful-research dept.

'Electric mud' teems with new, mysterious bacteria:

For Lars Peter Nielsen, it all began with the mysterious disappearance of hydrogen sulfide. The microbiologist had collected black, stinky mud from the bottom of Aarhus Harbor in Denmark, dropped it into big glass beakers, and inserted custom microsensors that detected changes in the mud's chemistry. At the start of the experiment, the muck was saturated with hydrogen sulfide—the source of the sediment's stink and color. But 30 days later, one band of mud had become paler, suggesting some hydrogen sulphide had gone missing. Eventually, the microsensors indicated that all of the compound had disappeared. Given what scientists knew about the biogeochemistry of mud, recalls Nielsen, who works at Aarhus University, "This didn't make sense at all."

The first explanation, he says, was that the sensors were wrong. But the cause turned out to be far stranger: bacteria that join cells end to end to build electrical cables able to carry current up to 5 centimeters [~2 inches] through mud. The adaptation, never seen before in a microbe, allows these so-called cable bacteria to overcome a major challenge facing many organisms that live in mud: a lack of oxygen. Its absence would normally keep bacteria from metabolizing compounds, such as hydrogen sulfide, as food. But the cables, by linking the microbes to sediments richer in oxygen, allow them to carry out the reaction long distance.

When Nielsen first described the discovery in 2009, colleagues were skeptical.

[...] But the more researchers have looked for "electrified" mud, the more they have found it, in both saltwater and fresh. They have also identified a second kind of mud-loving electric microbe: nanowire bacteria, individual cells that grow protein structures capable of moving electrons over shorter distances. These nanowire microbes live seemingly everywhere—including in the human mouth.

[Ed note: The story provides an outstanding example of the scientific method at work: hypothesize, test, examine results, and repeat as needed. Well worth reading.]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Tuesday August 25 2020, @11:10PM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Tuesday August 25 2020, @11:10PM (#1041834) Journal

    Why are researchers frequently portrayed as so skeptical that they come across as close-minded? Are they really that bad? Jaded by thousands of ideas that didn't work?

    Seems likely it's exaggerated. That's standard mainstream media melodramatization.

    I also wonder if Western individualism is blinkering their and our thinking. Bacterial nanowires are cool, but they shouldn't be extremely astonishing. Bacteria do a lot of cooperating and interact in ways far more intricate than simple predator-prey relationships. Those 3 billion years of Earth history in which all life was micro is an awful lot of time for bacteria societies to develop. I think of stromatolites as fossils of bacteria cities.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2