Facebook Braces Itself for Trump to Cast Doubt on Election Results:
Facebook spent years preparing to ward off any tampering on its site ahead of November's presidential election. Now the social network is getting ready in case President Trump interferes once the vote is over.
Employees at the Silicon Valley company are laying out contingency plans and walking through postelection scenarios that include attempts by Mr. Trump or his campaign to use the platform to delegitimize the results, people with knowledge of Facebook's plans said.
Facebook is preparing steps to take should Mr. Trump wrongly claim on the site that he won another four-year term, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Facebook is also working through how it might act if Mr. Trump tries to invalidate the results by declaring that the Postal Service lost mail-in ballots or that other groups meddled with the vote, the people said.
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's chief executive, and some of his lieutenants have started holding daily meetings about minimizing how the platform can be used to dispute the election, the people said. They have discussed a "kill switch" to shut off political advertising after Election Day since the ads, which Facebook does not police for truthfulness, could be used to spread misinformation, the people said.
The preparations underscore how rising concerns over the integrity of the November election have reached social media companies, whose sites can be used to amplify lies, conspiracy theories and inflammatory messages. YouTube and Twitter have also discussed plans for action if the postelection period becomes complicated, according to disinformation and political researchers who have advised the firms.
[...] The preparations underscore how rising concerns over the integrity of the November election have reached social media companies, whose sites can be used to amplify lies, conspiracy theories and inflammatory messages. YouTube and Twitter have also discussed plans for action if the postelection period becomes complicated, according to disinformation and political researchers who have advised the firms.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 25 2020, @03:48PM (5 children)
And how did the Republicans do that?
The idea that there are massive number of valid voters who, among other things, can't drive a car, open a bank account, get a job, get on an airplane, travel outside of country (at least if they hope to return), get a prescription for certain drugs, buy a house, etc., etc., etc. is ridiculous.
I guess there was talk of charging a small fee (~ $2) for a special ID. I know that in my current State, a non-driver ID card, which would be perfectly sufficient to prove the right to vote, costs $2 (and, if I remember correctly, is valid for as long as you live at the same address). The Dems want to spend Billions of dollars to "fix" the Post Office so they can rush through mail-in voting (which has already been a disaster in a number of primary elections). Compared to that, providing everyone who either legitimately couldn't prove their identity, or legitimately couldn't afford the $2, is trivial.
I'm still waiting for actual examples of these people who are eligible to vote but can't prove it.
(Score: 4, Informative) by tangomargarine on Tuesday August 25 2020, @06:00PM (2 children)
Yes, but they could even make it free, but it wouldn't matter if the office is only open every-other-Thursday for 3 hours in the afternoon or whatever, and there's a line out the door, so you have to take the day off from your crappy job that doesn't give you vacation. I'm not questioning whether the ID exists, but how easy it is to actually procure one.
https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheet [aclu.org]
Oh fuck off
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 1, Troll) by tangomargarine on Wednesday August 26 2020, @03:00PM (1 child)
Would love to see whoever modded me Troll defend that decision
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 26 2020, @08:10PM
Welcome to SN, you thought all the people complaining about terrible downmods was 100% false? My very anecdotal opinion is that conservatives got modded troll for pushing rightwing propaganda and got very hurt feelings. Now they go downmodding anything that goes against them as some kind of retribution.
There is no more appealing to reality, they have drawn their lines over which nothing but their masters can make them cross.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday August 26 2020, @12:01AM (1 child)
Personally, I don't think there should be ANY FEE AT ALL for a state issued photo ID. Driver's license, I can go along with a nominal fee. Plain old ID, no way.
(Score: 2) by dry on Wednesday August 26 2020, @04:41AM
Provincial ID here costs $75, same as a drivers license, which it is very similar to. When the Conservatives made the ID requirements for voting much stricter, my son didn't bother making the 60 mile round trip (doesn't drive and no public transportation) to pay for his ID and so didn't vote.
Since then the Province has updated our C.A.R.E. cards (needed to access health care) to have picture ID due to too many Americans sneaking in for free health care and they're free and basically required to prove Provincial residency if you don't want to pay for a Doctor/hospital visit.