Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 27 2020, @07:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the uphill-both-ways-in-the-snow dept.

School run: Cutting car use will take much more than educating children and parents:

As the summer holidays come to an end and children return to school following lockdown, there couldn't be a better time for us to consider the school commute. Nowadays, many children in the UK commute to school by car. But getting more parents to ditch the car for school journeys and switch to more active modes of travel, such as walking or cycling, is of great public health importance.

[...] As cities have expanded under suburban sprawl, commuting distances to school have increased. They are longer now than they have ever been before. This is another reason more children travel to school by car now than they used to. Less than half of all children in England attend their most local school.

An education policy that lets parents choose their child's school compounds the issue of suburban sprawl. Those parents that are able to exercise choice do so, and in some cases travel great distances so that their child attends the best-performing school. Once school choice has been decided, so too has children's mode of travel to school. Longer school commutes equals more car travel.

[...] Tackling the real causes of car dependency on the school commute would benefit children, society and the environment. It would solve several public health challenges.

If all children attended their local school, fewer children would travel by car, and because of this, fewer children would be injured on the roads. There would be less noise pollution and less air pollution, which would reduce children's risk of developing respiratory conditions. We would see more people speaking to each other on our streets because of the increase in footfall, and there would be an improved sense of safety because there would be more "eyes on the street."

Will eliminating school choice for children make them healthier?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by crafoo on Thursday August 27 2020, @07:33PM (3 children)

    by crafoo (6639) on Thursday August 27 2020, @07:33PM (#1042855)

    Fire 3/4 of school administrators as a start. Also, we should always err on the side of more choices and more freedom, not less.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Troll=1, Insightful=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2020, @03:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2020, @03:05PM (#1043346)

    Obv except for methods of voting. Then we need fewer.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2020, @05:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2020, @05:35PM (#1043419)

    parents need to grow a spine and stop sending their kids to be raised the state brainwashing camp.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 30 2020, @12:03AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 30 2020, @12:03AM (#1043988)

    Wonderful, ignorant "common sense" type stuff that appeals to blue collar workers who don't think administrators serve any purpose. More like slash the salaries of the district level admins, and yes probably some admin positions could be slashed but not 3/4.

    I know, easy to digest clickbait is much more appealing and requires very little effort on crafoo's part.