Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 27 2020, @07:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the uphill-both-ways-in-the-snow dept.

School run: Cutting car use will take much more than educating children and parents:

As the summer holidays come to an end and children return to school following lockdown, there couldn't be a better time for us to consider the school commute. Nowadays, many children in the UK commute to school by car. But getting more parents to ditch the car for school journeys and switch to more active modes of travel, such as walking or cycling, is of great public health importance.

[...] As cities have expanded under suburban sprawl, commuting distances to school have increased. They are longer now than they have ever been before. This is another reason more children travel to school by car now than they used to. Less than half of all children in England attend their most local school.

An education policy that lets parents choose their child's school compounds the issue of suburban sprawl. Those parents that are able to exercise choice do so, and in some cases travel great distances so that their child attends the best-performing school. Once school choice has been decided, so too has children's mode of travel to school. Longer school commutes equals more car travel.

[...] Tackling the real causes of car dependency on the school commute would benefit children, society and the environment. It would solve several public health challenges.

If all children attended their local school, fewer children would travel by car, and because of this, fewer children would be injured on the roads. There would be less noise pollution and less air pollution, which would reduce children's risk of developing respiratory conditions. We would see more people speaking to each other on our streets because of the increase in footfall, and there would be an improved sense of safety because there would be more "eyes on the street."

Will eliminating school choice for children make them healthier?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Friday August 28 2020, @12:59PM (1 child)

    by VLM (445) on Friday August 28 2020, @12:59PM (#1043256)

    Can't have equality in a multicultural environment.

    In a multicultural environment people will always self segregate into their socioeconomic groups for various affinity reasons.

    Therefore this is really an argument to zone residential to tight demographic groups, so that only Jews can live in the Jewish quarter, the arabs will all live in the arab quarter, the remaining few whites in UK will live in the ever shrinking white quarter, etc.

    You also save a lot of money on ethnic grocery stores and religious institutions. No point building a mosque in the Jewish-only neighborhood etc.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 30 2020, @12:14AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 30 2020, @12:14AM (#1043994)

    Thhheeerrrree is the racism we've come to expect. Strange it took you so long, tried to reign it in for a while huh? Then you got bored and just couldn't keep it in anymore.