Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Sunday August 30 2020, @01:49AM   Printer-friendly

Tools behind Belarus internet censorship potentially revealed:

According to a Bloomberg report, the technology used to block much of the internet access during the recent presidential elections in Belarus has come from a US-based company.

The report states that Sandvine Inc., had supplied the necessary equipment to the Lukashenko government a few months earlier through an intermediary.

On August 9, Belarus held the presidential elections where Alexander Lukashenko was elected for the sixth consecutive time. However, the Election Day was marked by irregularities that cast doubt on the transparency of the elections.

In addition to the barricades built by security forces that prevented the passage of civilians to Minsk, Belarus' capital, the internet services in the country had a major disruption that affected access to websites such as social networks, news pages, and messaging applications.

The disruption lasted for up to three days, and there are still websites that are inaccessible in a normal way, so citizens need to use tools such as VPNs or specialized browsers.

[...] This would not be the first time the technology has been accused of being used to repress a nation. Citizen Lab, a Toronto security firm, had indicated that in 2018 equipment from this manufacturer was used in internet blocks that occurred in Egypt and Turkey. Sandvine Inc. said this investigation was false.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by Tokolosh on Sunday August 30 2020, @02:54AM (6 children)

    by Tokolosh (585) on Sunday August 30 2020, @02:54AM (#1044055)

    I look forward to the day when Mr. Musk airdrops UFOs on sticks to any place that has lost internet connectivity - naughty autocrats, natural disasters, incompetence, whatever.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Offtopic=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:26AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:26AM (#1044062)

    I look forward to the day when Mr. Musk airdrops UFOs on sticks to any place that has lost internet connectivity - naughty autocrats, natural disasters, incompetence, whatever.

    Airdropped corndogs and beer beat UFOs on sticks any day.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by Runaway1956 on Sunday August 30 2020, @05:36AM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 30 2020, @05:36AM (#1044096) Journal

      QOTD: Take your Senator to lunch this week.

      Can we just airdrop some senators and congressmen on sticks? We could think up a cool name - like - ohhhhh - how about "Shitkabob"?

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday August 30 2020, @06:36AM (3 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday August 30 2020, @06:36AM (#1044101) Journal

    Not just any place?

    Elon Musk's plan to blanket Earth in high-speed internet may face a big threat: China [businessinsider.com]

    "Obviously, any given country can say it's illegal to have a ground link. [...] And from our standpoint we could conceivably continue to broadcast," Musk said during the event. "I mean, I'm hopeful that we can structure agreements with various countries to allow communication with their citizens, but it is on a country-by-country basis."

    So what if SpaceX continued to broadcast uncensored internet over China, despite not being given permission?

    "If they get upset with us, they can blow our satellites up, which wouldn't be good," Musk said. "China can do that. So probably we shouldn't broadcast there."

    This article in Hong Kong's SCMP (not long for this world?) is much more optimistic [scmp.com]:

    It potentially marks the end of internet censorship – or at least makes it very difficult. Starlink’s “pizza box” terminals access the free global internet from anywhere, making it incredibly difficult for governments to block off the bits they don’t want citizens to see. The signals would bypass China’s Great Firewall, for instance, and it would no longer be possible for governments to implement internet shutdowns, as India often does on the grounds of public order.

    How can any government stop it? They may ban the sale of the antennas, but with a 3D printer and some ingenuity people would soon be able to make them. Jamming signals or shooting down thousands of small satellites will be tricky, the only option would be to ask Elon personally to turn it off.

    But not this one: Does Elon Musk’s dream of satellite internet for all matter to anyone in China? [scmp.com]

    This article originally appeared on ABACUS [abacusnews.com]

    [...] One possible scenario would be for Starlink user terminals to be smuggled into China. It would then be technically possible for people with the terminals and an active account to use the service within the country.

    But if Musk’s own words are any indication, he doesn’t seem too keen on this approach. In a speech in 2015 [youtu.be], when Starlink debuted at a SpaceX factory in Seattle, Musk said China has the “choice to shoot our satellites down” if Starlink broadcasts in the country.

    [...] So if Starlink ever does figure out a way to officially provide service in China, it probably won’t make a difference to Chinese users, according to Lan. It would likely offer a similar user experience to landline internet, and it wouldn’t change the reality of internet censorship in the country.

    “If you want to provide service in China, you have to comply with all of China’s requirements in terms of communications regulation, otherwise you won’t even get permission,” Lan said. “And if you satisfy regulators’ demands, then for users, it’s the same.”

    Wherever governments are incapable of stopping it, it could flourish. Egypt [wikipedia.org] would be one example. All you need are smuggled in user terminals. Also, SpaceX has to get intersatellite links working, which they haven't done at all with v1.0 satellites.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by Tokolosh on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:11PM (2 children)

      by Tokolosh (585) on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:11PM (#1044187)

      A Chinese attack on Starlink would result in a Kessler syndrome and massive collateral consequences for China. I don't think they will risk it.

      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:27PM (1 child)

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:27PM (#1044193) Journal

        No Kessler syndrome in LEO.

        China could also try jamming or tracking the users, or could exercise pressure on Musk some other way. Like booting Tesla out of the country.

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:37PM

          by fustakrakich (6150) on Sunday August 30 2020, @03:37PM (#1044196) Journal

          If China starts blowing up satellites, I will assume theirs will be pulverized also. I doubt very much it is very one sided either way. The best thing for Musk to do is to put up a heavy swarm of satellites that are more difficult to pin down. That should work until the laser cannons are deployed.

          No of these people care about "freedom", they do what is necessary to stay in business.

          --
          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..