Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 01 2020, @06:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the yummy-yummy-in-my-tummy? dept.

Study finds insect shows promise as a good, sustainable food source:

With global food demands rising at an alarming rate, a study led by IUPUI [( Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis)] scientists has found new evidence that a previously overlooked insect shows promise as alternative protein source: the yellow mealworm.

The research is based upon a new analysis of the genome of the mealworm species Tenebrio molitor led by Christine Picard, associate professor of biology and director in Forensic and Investigative Sciences program at the School of Science at IUPUI.

[...] "Human populations are continuing to increase and the stress on protein production is increasing at an unsustainable rate, not even considering climate change," said Picard, whose lab focuses on the use of insects to address global food demand.

The research, conducted in partnership with Beta Hatch Inc., has found the yellow mealworm—historically a pest—can provide benefit in a wide range of agriculture applications. Not only can it can be used as an alternative source of protein for animals including fish, but its waste is also ideal as organic fertilizer.

[...] "Mealworms, being insects, are a part of the natural diet of many organisms," said Picard. "Fish enjoy mealworms, for example. They could also be really useful in the pet food industry as an alternative protein source. Chickens like insects—and maybe one day humans will, too, because it's an alternative source of protein."

Journal Reference:
T. Eriksson, et al. The yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) genome: a resource for the emerging insects as food and feed industry [open], Journal of Insects as Food and Feed (DOI: 10.3920/jiff2019.0057)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Wednesday September 02 2020, @04:25AM (1 child)

    by deimtee (3272) on Wednesday September 02 2020, @04:25AM (#1045247) Journal

    What is different is that we have never had billions of people living on coastlines that will soon be underwater if we continue along our current path.

    Depends on your definition of "soon". Moving a couple of meters up the shoreline every century isn't going to collapse society. We might lose some iconic buildings but normal redevelopment can take care of most of rebuilding on slightly higher ground.

    What we should be doing, if you really believe sea level rise is a threat, is passing a law that says there will be no government compensation for ocean flooding for any building built from this point forward. You want to risk building where it might flood, that's your problem, you don't get to unload it on society.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 02 2020, @12:13PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 02 2020, @12:13PM (#1045328)

    Years ago, the government did something similar with redefining where the flood planes were. But, that was something that happened during the Obama administration, so immediately all the racists that inhabit the Republican party objected. Technicually people could still build in the flood plain, it's just that their hopes for being compensated in case of floods were greatly diminished. Given the amount of flooding now versus 30 years ago, it was a move that should have already happened.