Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday September 02 2020, @05:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-second-mouse-gets-the-cheese dept.

Empirical evidence that nice people don't always finish last:

Think your boss is a jerk? Wonder why the management of your organization consists of sociopaths? Some academic researchers suspect you're not alone, and they start their new paper with the statement, "We suffer no shortage of jerks in power." And they go on to ask the obvious question raised by this fact: "Does being a jerk help people attain power?"

To find out, the researchers set up a very long-term experiment. After administering personality surveys to undergrad and MBA students, they waited over a decade to follow up and find out which personality types had accrued power in the world of employment. The results suggest that jerks don't necessarily get ahead at work; instead, some of the consequences of being unpleasant offset the benefits that it might otherwise provide.

[...] The good news here is that, as the researchers put it, "individuals who were more selfish, combative, and deceitful did not, subsequently, attain higher power." So, nice people do not necessarily finish last. But, at the same time, nobody seems to be held back by displaying that list of behaviors on the job.

Journal Reference:
Cameron Anderson, Daron L. Sharps, Christopher J. Soto, et al. People with disagreeable personalities (selfish, combative, and manipulative) do not have an advantage in pursuing power at work [$], Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005088117)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Bot on Wednesday September 02 2020, @12:50PM (3 children)

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday September 02 2020, @12:50PM (#1045348) Journal

    Back in the draft, all designed corporals (the ones nominated after three months) were of the asshole/dismissive kind. I understood why after being made corporal myself later, it saves a lot of time and drama with the assholes you gotta order around, because they fear you. With a non asshole strict guy, they evaluate more the risk/benefits of disobeying. With a non asshole non strict guy, they do whatever they want till everyone gets in trouble.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 02 2020, @07:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 02 2020, @07:26PM (#1045559)

    Ah yes, we should model society after the military! /s

    A terrible idea, and the reason why military hierarchy exists is because they have to prepare for when the orders are literally life and death situations. Makes sense why a fascist like yourself would fetishize that social structure.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 03 2020, @01:17AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 03 2020, @01:17AM (#1045678)

    This explains your commenting style!

    • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday September 04 2020, @10:16AM

      by Bot (3902) on Friday September 04 2020, @10:16AM (#1046270) Journal

      Except here on SN, no matter the tones (you imbecile), there is no war, so discipline and hierarchies are irrelevant. In war, and in the current state of business ( post apocalyptic emerging social credit by the money printers), hierarchies and discipline are useful.

      --
      Account abandoned.