Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday September 03 2020, @11:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the we-know-where-you-were dept.

Federal court rules geofence warrants are unconstitutional:

In another round of increasingly rare good news in the realm of privacy, individual rights and freedom, two separate US federal judges have found geofence warrants to be unconstitutional.

Geofence warrants have been around for some time now. Essentially, it's a new investigative technique wherein law enforcement, rather than surveilling a suspect to discover if they had been at the scene of a crime, they work backwards by identifying everyone that's been at a particular location and surveilling them until they discover which one of them is a possible suspect.

[...] US courts have recently begun accepting that our smartphones hold so much data about us that they should be protected by the fourth amendment, as an extension of our homes.

Three separate unsealed opinions from two federal magistrate judges have come to the same conclusion: that these warrants lack the probable cause and particularity requirements of the fourth amendment.

[...] It's disturbing to think of just how many Americans' constitutional rights would have been violated if the warrant was granted. Even more disturbing is other such warrants possibly getting granted regularly, aside from what information Google willingly hands over to governments.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 03 2020, @12:15PM (11 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 03 2020, @12:15PM (#1045824)

    See subject: You don't have enough spamdownmodpoints to abuse & censor me. I can post as much as I want & you can't stop me.

    * You were run dry of abused downmodpoints. Give up already.

    I have better things to do than hang around w/ you losers. I'm permanently stopping now because you losers aren't worth my time. But I own this place & I can post as much as I want whenever I want.

    APK

    P.S.=> You fakename fools still can't stop me from doing what I want @ this shithole site... apk

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Spam=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Spam' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by khallow on Thursday September 03 2020, @02:29PM (7 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 03 2020, @02:29PM (#1045861) Journal

    I have better things to do than hang around w/ you losers.

    I agree. So why aren't you doing those better things? Go forth and have that awesome time. It's not like shitposting the same nonsense a hundred times is going anywhere here.

    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 03 2020, @03:41PM (6 children)

      by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 03 2020, @03:41PM (#1045887) Journal

      :-) Arguing with bots now? Everybody's crazier than I thought

      You know, if we ever get a functional congress some day, they can write an actual law prohibiting this, with real penalties for violations.

      --
      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
      • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Thursday September 03 2020, @03:59PM (5 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 03 2020, @03:59PM (#1045891) Journal

        You know, if we ever get a functional congress some day, they can write an actual law prohibiting this, with real penalties for violations.

        I would rather have a non-functional congress than that. You're not selling the "functional congress" thing very well.

        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:11PM (4 children)

          by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:11PM (#1045897) Journal

          I would rather have a non-functional congress than that.

          Then I will assume you are perfectly happy with the one you have. You know that is psychotic, right?

          If you can't produce a functional congress, that is a reflection on YOU! Congress is you people! You put them there, so please, save your breath, unless you like playing the fool.

          --
          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:13PM (3 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:13PM (#1045899) Journal

            You know that is psychotic, right?

            Nope. And you don't know that either.

            If you can't produce a functional congress, that is a reflection on YOU! Congress is you people! You put them there, so please, save your breath, unless you like playing the fool.

            We already know you failed to sell the concept. So it's your fault and a reflection on YOU! Congress is you people! You put them there, so please, save your breath, unless you like playing the fool.

            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:20PM (2 children)

              by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:20PM (#1045902) Journal

              Nope.

              Ah, so sorry, I keep forgetting, being on the inside precludes any possibility of you noticing.

              You speak gibberish. You are responsible for the people you reelect. Nobody else can be.

              --
              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:26PM (1 child)

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 03 2020, @04:26PM (#1045908) Journal

                You speak gibberish.

                You're projecting again.

                • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 03 2020, @05:40PM

                  by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 03 2020, @05:40PM (#1045938) Journal

                  :-) You're talking to yourself again

                  I'll admit I was expecting better of you. Hope is eternal

                  --
                  La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday September 03 2020, @06:37PM (2 children)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday September 03 2020, @06:37PM (#1045970) Homepage Journal

    There are more than a hundred thousand mod points out there each and every day. So, yeah, you're not going to go beyond what moderation and built in speed limits can handle. I very much doubt there are enough open proxies in the world to do so.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday September 03 2020, @07:38PM (1 child)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 03 2020, @07:38PM (#1046010) Journal

      It only has to crap post enough to be highly annoying. And it seems to be effectively able to do that.

      The manufacture of that many mod points could be draining the planet's natural resources. The disposal of that many used mod points could endanger the ecosystem. Especially if the mod points all end up collecting in the oceans.

      What if there were an increased number of spam mod points handed out? That is, those could only be used for spam. Alternately, modding spam would count against a different daily limit, not affecting the normal daily limit of mod points. Queries could identify users who give out more spam mods, to help spot abuses.

      --
      The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.