Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Thursday September 03 2020, @11:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the we-know-where-you-were dept.

Federal court rules geofence warrants are unconstitutional:

In another round of increasingly rare good news in the realm of privacy, individual rights and freedom, two separate US federal judges have found geofence warrants to be unconstitutional.

Geofence warrants have been around for some time now. Essentially, it's a new investigative technique wherein law enforcement, rather than surveilling a suspect to discover if they had been at the scene of a crime, they work backwards by identifying everyone that's been at a particular location and surveilling them until they discover which one of them is a possible suspect.

[...] US courts have recently begun accepting that our smartphones hold so much data about us that they should be protected by the fourth amendment, as an extension of our homes.

Three separate unsealed opinions from two federal magistrate judges have come to the same conclusion: that these warrants lack the probable cause and particularity requirements of the fourth amendment.

[...] It's disturbing to think of just how many Americans' constitutional rights would have been violated if the warrant was granted. Even more disturbing is other such warrants possibly getting granted regularly, aside from what information Google willingly hands over to governments.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday September 03 2020, @07:38PM (1 child)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 03 2020, @07:38PM (#1046010) Journal

    It only has to crap post enough to be highly annoying. And it seems to be effectively able to do that.

    The manufacture of that many mod points could be draining the planet's natural resources. The disposal of that many used mod points could endanger the ecosystem. Especially if the mod points all end up collecting in the oceans.

    What if there were an increased number of spam mod points handed out? That is, those could only be used for spam. Alternately, modding spam would count against a different daily limit, not affecting the normal daily limit of mod points. Queries could identify users who give out more spam mods, to help spot abuses.

    --
    When trying to solve a problem don't ask who suffers from the problem, ask who profits from the problem.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday September 03 2020, @08:16PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday September 03 2020, @08:16PM (#1046036) Homepage Journal

    I use all the leftovers in my catfish bait recipe. Recycling and cheap catfish bait FTW!

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.