Scientific American (SA) points out that although there are medical illustrators on staff at the University of Southern California it is highly likely that they were not consulted before putting out the cited press release about a $50 million dollar donation. The brain is shown back to front!
Additional images of the brain are available from Google.
Update: 04/05 18:27 GMT by mrcoolbp : User wantkitteh points out that the inaccurate image has been pulled from the USC links (though it's showing in the SA article at the time of this update)
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday April 05 2015, @10:53AM
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 4, Informative) by FatPhil on Sunday April 05 2015, @10:55AM
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday April 05 2015, @11:03AM
That one too.
(Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday April 05 2015, @11:01AM
This [twimg.com]. As shown in the Scientific American link (scroll down).
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday April 05 2015, @11:17AM
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday April 05 2015, @05:15PM
That explains the confusion. Perhaps SA thinks it's still the 1st?!?
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday April 05 2015, @01:24PM
Ahhhhhh - I didn't see that image. Yeah - backward. As suggested above though, it could well be a congress critter.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 05 2015, @11:19PM
LOL