Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Saturday April 04 2015, @10:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the Que-lastima! dept.

A report that could be bad news for many Californians describes how 2 faults are, in fact, connected which might have significant consequences:

University of California, Berkeley seismologists have proven that the Hayward Fault is essentially a branch of the Calaveras Fault that runs east of San Jose, which means that both could rupture together, resulting in a significantly more destructive earthquake than previously thought. "The maximum earthquake on a fault is proportional to its length, so by having the two directly connected, we can have a rupture propagating across from one to the other, making a larger quake," said lead researcher Estelle Chaussard, a post-doctoral fellow in the Berkeley Seismological Laboratory. "People have been looking for evidence of this for a long time, but only now do we have the data to prove it."

The 70-kilometer-long Hayward Fault is already known as one of the most dangerous in the country because it runs through large population areas from its northern limit on San Pablo Bay at Richmond to its southern end south of Fremont. In an update of seismic hazards last month, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated a 14.3 percent likelihood of a magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake on the Hayward Fault in the next 30 years, and a 7.4 percent chance on the Calaveras Fault. These are based on the assumption that the two faults are independent systems, and that the maximum quake on the Hayward Fault would be between magnitudes 6.9 and 7.0. Given that the Hayward and Calaveras faults are connected, the energy released in a simultaneous rupture could be 2.5 times greater, or a magnitude 7.3 quake.

"A rupture from Richmond to Gilroy would produce about a 7.3 magnitude quake, but it would be even greater if the rupture extended south to Hollister, where the Calaveras Fault meets the San Andreas Fault," Chaussard said.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Sunday April 05 2015, @04:29PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Sunday April 05 2015, @04:29PM (#166690) Journal

    It's problematic because as a casual visitor it's near impossible to avoid or know which buildings that are insufficiently strengthened. Or avoiding being nearby in order to not have anything fall on your head. It may also complicate finding somewhere to live or selecting work. Buildings where you will spend a lot of time and thus their status will affect your risk significantly.

    The latency from these new findings until almost all buildings are strengthened may just be longer than it takes for the next quake to happen.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2