Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Sunday April 05 2015, @10:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the theirs-gold-in-them-thar-prostates dept.

A test that costs less than a $1 and yields results in minutes has been shown in newly published studies to be more sensitive and more exact than the current standard test for early-stage prostate cancer.

The simple test developed by University of Central Florida scientist Qun "Treen" Huo holds the promise of earlier detection of one of the deadliest cancers among men. It would also reduce the number of unnecessary and invasive biopsies stemming from the less precise PSA test that's now used.

When a cancerous tumor begins to develop, the body mobilizes to produce antibodies. Huo's test detects that immune response using gold nanoparticles about 10,000 times smaller than a freckle.

When a few drops of blood serum from a finger prick are mixed with the gold nanoparticles, certain cancer biomarkers cling to the surface of the tiny particles, increasing their size and causing them to clump together.

Among researchers, gold nanoparticles are known for their extraordinary efficiency at absorbing and scattering light. Huo and her team at UCF's NanoScience Technology Center developed a technique known as nanoparticle-enabled dynamic light scattering assay (NanoDLSay) to measure the size of the particles by analyzing the light they throw off. That size reveals whether a patient has prostate cancer and how advanced it may be.

And although it uses gold, the test is cheap. A small bottle of nanoparticles suspended in water costs about $250, and contains enough for about 2,500 tests.

http://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology-news/newsid=39654.php

[Source]: http://today.ucf.edu/cheap-prostate-cancer-test-better-than-psa/

[Abstract]: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsami.5b00371

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Sunday April 05 2015, @01:33PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 05 2015, @01:33PM (#166652) Journal

    I wonder if it could be marketed as a home test? People with reason to suspect/fear that they might develop cancer might be willing to do a home test.

    Don't laugh, people. How old is the pregnancy home test? My grandma certainly didn't have that option when she was in her child bearing years!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5