Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Sunday April 05 2015, @04:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the lemme-say-whut-i-want dept.

Recently, oral arguments were heard regarding a case about license plates and the first amendment. The Texas division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans has challenged a rejection of their proposed plate that had images of the Confederate flag.

The Texas solicitor general argued that, "Messages on Texas license plates are government speech ... [because] Texas etches its name onto each license plate and Texas law gives the state sole control and final approval authority over everything that appears on a license plate.”

Please share your ideas/comments on this case or your views on vanity plates in general.

Story: http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-supreme-court-confederate-license-plates-20150323-story.html
Case: http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/2014_14_144
What a vanity plate is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanity_plate

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 05 2015, @11:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 05 2015, @11:53PM (#166798)

    But to turn on your own, to attack without warning those you are joined with in a civil union, that is something that is always wrong, in all cultures. Even those who defect from evil regimes are suspect, since they have turned on those who trusted them, and even if they say they are now on our side (the side of good and cookies!), we cannot trust them.

    You have just explained exactly why so many people hate Edward Snowden.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @02:46AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @02:46AM (#166831)

    Because they're government bootlickers who don't care one bit for the principles and freedoms the US is supposed to stand for. Mindless tribalism is all it is.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @06:23AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @06:23AM (#166861)

      Ironically your post is an example of mindless tribalism too. So meta!

      Sure I'm being snarky, but given how the discussion had clearly identified those who defect from evil regimes, you still had to come along and do a bit of mindless cheerleading for your tribe rather than accept any possibility of nuance. And then someone modded you up as "informative" as if what you wrote actually added anything new to the discussion, like there have not been literally a million other posts saying exactly the same thing since Snowden defected.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @11:56AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @11:56AM (#166924)

        Ironically your post is an example of mindless tribalism too. So meta!

        Actually, no it's not. It's an example of me forming an individual opinion and cheering on someone who challenged the intolerable status quo.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @02:49PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 06 2015, @02:49PM (#166988)

          Woooosh!

          Of course the tribalist thinks his cheerleading is valid and meaningful.