Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday April 12 2015, @02:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the *my*-hat-is-made-of-titanium dept.

With the now-commonplace revelation of US mass-data gathering and surveillance, there is still a fundamental gap in the mainstream media and news outlets containing factual description of these programs. Since the release of documents by Edward Snowden, the shorthand "NSA" is tossed about with little comprehension or context. At the EmptyWheel blog, Marcy Wheeler has done an invaluable service by collating and cataloging "A Guide to the 5+ Known Intelligence Community Telecommunications Metadata Dragnets".

I've been laying this explanation out since USA Today provided new details on DEA's International Dragnet, but it's clear it needs to be done in more systematic fashion, because really smart people continue to mistakenly treat the Section 215 database as the analogue to the DEA dragnet described by USAT, which it's not. There are at least five known telecommunications dragnets (some of which appear to integrate other kinds of metadata, especially Internet metadata).

Explaining in detail what is known to be collected in five or more programs, by four or five agencies in separate domestic and international operations is something that resists a soundbite. This concise presentation of the known mass surveillance programs is the most accessible to date.

You may also be interested in Cryptome's periodic tally of Snowden document releases.
 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Jeremiah Cornelius on Sunday April 12 2015, @05:05PM

    by Jeremiah Cornelius (2785) on Sunday April 12 2015, @05:05PM (#169357) Journal

    That's a general tactic of the military. They create a complex, jargony, insider language intended to obfuscate purpose, inflate importance and exclude outsiders.

    They don't speak Latin - and develop layers of abbreviation and acronym built from over-specific non-standard naming. "Rotary Air Circulatory Device" is very military. RACiD is even more so. Next thing you know, everyone talks about the tactical advantage of rapid deployment of RACiD, when they just need a fan.

    --
    You're betting on the pantomime horse...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:38PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:38PM (#169375)

    develop layers of abbreviation and acronym built from over-specific non-standard naming.

    A big part of that is not wanting to be sued. They can't call velcro "Velcro" because the Vecro company will sue the shit out of them, so it becomes "hook and pile"; etc. Still not sure who would sue them for "jumping jacks" (now called "side-straddle hops") but I suppose once it became a trend they just went crazy with it.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @10:17PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @10:17PM (#169443)

    > That's a general tactic of the military.

    It isn't a military thing, it is a profession thing. All professions develop their own jargon, the more complexity in the profession the more dense the jargon. The computer industry is a sterling example of that.