IBM and FUJIFILM have demonstrated the equivalent of an LTO magnetic tape cartridge with a capacity of 220 terabytes.
To achieve 123 billion bits per square inch, IBM researchers developed several new technologies, including:
- A set of advanced servo control technologies that include a high bandwidth head actuator, a servo pattern and servo channel and a set of tape speed optimized H-infinity track follow controllers that together enable head positioning with an accuracy better than 6 nanometers. This enables a track density of 181,300 tracks per inch, a more than 39 fold increase over LTO6.
- An enhanced write field head technology that enables the use of much finer barium ferrite (BaFe) particles.
- Innovative signal-processing algorithms for the data channel, based on noise-predictive detection principles, enable reliable operation with an ultra narrow 90nm wide giant magnetoresistive (GMR) reader.
Rumors of tape's death are greatly exaggerated; LTO-6 tape pricing has fallen to $0.02 per GB, and a record 6.6 exabytes of tape were shipped in Q3 2014. The LTO roadmap calls for 48 terabyte LTO-10 tapes at some point in the future. Each new generation of LTO roughly doubles capacity, so a 200 TB LTO-12 tape may be slated for 2030.
In April 2014, Sony announced the development of 148 Gb/in2 tape that could enable a 185 TB tape cartridge. A month later, IBM and FUJIFILM announced that they had achieved the equivalent of an 85.9 Gb/in2, 154 TB tape. The new tape is based on the same NANOCUBICâ„¢ technology.
Edit: Changed to reflect a tape cost of $8/TB compressed, $20/TB uncompressed.
(Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Monday April 13 2015, @12:46AM
Does it matter that they couldn't double it if they are going to multiply it by 2.56 for the next cartridge? Roadmaps aside, the product is either fit for the job or not. Also, they changed the compression to allow 2.5:1 with LTO-6 and future tapes rather than 2:1 with LTO-5.
I agree on the marketing. It's as if they're saying you can't compress on other mediums. Luckily, the 154/185/220 TB figures in this article are uncompressed. So with a little marketing they become 385/463/550 TB.
It looks like $0.008 is for compressed [lto.org]. So it's up to $0.02/GB for uncompressed. Not bad, but not as good.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]