Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday April 14 2015, @10:29AM   Printer-friendly
from the official-protection-racket dept.

ICANN has been asked by its formal advisory body, the Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), to investigate Vox Populi Registry Inc. for alleged wrongdoing in regards to the ".sucks" gTLD.

According to the BBC:

Specialist online website Domain Incite reports that actor "Kevin Spacey, Microsoft, Google and Apple have already bought up '.sucks' sites in a bid to protect their reputations". This practice is known as "defensive registering".

Icann granted Vox Populi permission to sell the ".sucks" names but is now concerned at the price levels the Canadian company has set. Kevin Murphy, from Domain Incite, told the BBC two key elements of the way Vox Populi was handling the sale were causing concern.

"They are charging a $2,000 'sunrise' premium to those wishing to register '.sucks' addresses early, before the addresses go on sale to the general public [next month]," he said. "Also they are using a list of words or names that have been defensively registered in the past, for which they are charging the top amount."

Mr Murphy said the company was working from a list of keywords that had been part of web addresses bought up early on in similar new domain web address sales and using that to decide which ".sucks" addresses to charge more for.

Although ICANN has been urged to end the shakedown by the likes of US Senator Jay Rockefeller, the CEO of Vox Populi has defended .sucks, claiming that the pricing strategy was intended to strike a balance between the rights of trademark holders and the ability of critics to lampoon people and brands, as originally intended by Ralph Nader when his group Consumer Project for Technology proposed the TLD back in 2000.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by kaszz on Tuesday April 14 2015, @02:22PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday April 14 2015, @02:22PM (#170397) Journal

    Those scandals are mostly about distracting people from the real issues.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 14 2015, @08:47PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 14 2015, @08:47PM (#170539)

    What was the real issue that we were being distracted from? Record growth, financial prosperity, no wars, and a democratic party that was worth a damn? Yeah I see your point, must've been the last one.

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 14 2015, @08:59PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 14 2015, @08:59PM (#170544)

      You are right, it was about distracting from the success of democrats.

      That sounds flippant, but its no joke. It was a lull so they had to manufacture controversy to keep the base engaged - give the republicans something to rally around.