Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday April 17 2015, @03:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the SPE-should-copyright-it dept.

WikiLeaks has published "The Sony Archives," a searchable database containing 30,287 documents and 173,132 emails leaked from Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE). The WikiLeaks press release portrays the archive as newsworthy and in the public interest:

WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange said: "This archive shows the inner workings of an influential multinational corporation. It is newsworthy and at the centre of a geo-political conflict. It belongs in the public domain. WikiLeaks will ensure it stays there."

Sony is a member of the MPAA and a strong lobbyist on issues around internet policy, piracy, trade agreements and copyright issues. The emails show the back and forth on lobbying and political efforts, not only with the MPAA but with politicians directly. In November 2013 WikiLeaks published a secret draft of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) IP Chapter. The Sony Archives show SPE's internal reactions, including discussing the impact with Michael Froman, the US Trade Representative. It also references the case against Megaupload and the extradition of its founder Kim DotCom from New Zealand as part of SPE's war on piracy.

The connections and alignments between Sony Pictures Entertainment and the US Democratic Party are detailed through the archives, including SPE's CEO Lynton attending dinner with President Obama at Martha's Vineyard and Sony employees being part of fundraising dinners for the Democratic Party. There are emails setting up a collective within the corporation to get around the 5,000 USD limit on corporate campaign donations to give 50,000 USD to get the Democratic New York Governor Andrew Cuomo elected as "Thanks to Governor Cuomo, we have a great production incentive environment in NY and a strong piracy advocate that’s actually done more than talk about our problems."

Sony Pictures Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton is on the board of trustees of RAND Corporation, an organisation specialising in research and development for the United States military and intelligence sector. The Sony Archives show the flow of contacts and information between these two major US industries, whether it is RAND wanting to invite George Clooney and Kevin Spacey to events, or Lynton offering contact to Valerie Jarrett (a close advisor to Obama) or RAND desiring a partnership with IMAX for digital archiving. With this close tie to the military-industrial complex it is no surprise that Sony reached out to RAND for advice regarding its North Korea film The Interview. RAND provided an analyst specialised in North Korea and suggested Sony reach out to the State Department and the NSA regarding North Korea's complaints about the upcoming film. The Sony documents also show Sony being in possession of a brochure for an NSA-evaluated online cloud security set-up called INTEGRITY.

Additional coverage at BBC and LA Times. Sony has condemned the document dump:

"The attackers used the dissemination of stolen information to try to harm SPE and its employees, and now WikiLeaks regrettably is assisting them in that effort," said a Sony Pictures spokesperson in a statement. "We vehemently disagree with WikiLeaks' assertion that this material belongs in the public domain and will continue to fight for the safety, security, and privacy of our company and its more than 6,000 employees."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by SubiculumHammer on Friday April 17 2015, @04:17PM

    by SubiculumHammer (5191) on Friday April 17 2015, @04:17PM (#172089)

    Private info of low level employees should have been redacted.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1) by kadal on Friday April 17 2015, @04:35PM

    by kadal (4731) on Friday April 17 2015, @04:35PM (#172097)

    They seem to never really redact much, do they? It would help their publicity if they did, me thinks.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Friday April 17 2015, @04:45PM

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Friday April 17 2015, @04:45PM (#172102) Journal

    WikiLeaks is the new Jeb Bush [theverge.com].

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2015, @10:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2015, @10:23PM (#172206)

    > Private info of low level employees should have been redacted.

    I expect the reason it wasn't redacted is because wikileaks is not releasing the data dump, they are just making it easy to search. The dump was previously released last year, perhaps you remember the enormous [soylentnews.org] amount [soylentnews.org] of hoopla. [soylentnews.org] I'm sure their reasoning is that redacting it would be just as effective as the US DoD continuing to keep leaked files classified.

    • (Score: 1) by Soybean on Friday April 17 2015, @11:39PM

      by Soybean (5020) on Friday April 17 2015, @11:39PM (#172225)

      I have family in the business - two producers and a model/actress. Wikileaks made it easy to check if any of their names were mentioned in the data dump (they were not). I was grateful for that.