Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday April 17 2015, @11:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the glowing-maritime-adventures dept.

Aaron Kinney writes in the San Jose Mercury News that scientists have captured the first clear images of the USS Independence, a radioactivity-polluted World War II aircraft carrier that rests on the ocean floor 30 miles off the coast of Half Moon Bay. The Independence saw combat at Wake Island and other decisive battles against Japan in 1944 and 1945 and was later blasted with radiation in two South Pacific nuclear tests. Assigned as a target vessel for the Operation Crossroads atomic bomb tests, she was placed within one-half-mile of ground zero and was engulfed in a fireball and heavily damaged during the 1946 nuclear weapons tests at Bikini Atoll. The veteran ship did not sink, however (though her funnels and island were crumpled by the blast), and after taking part in another explosion on 25 July, the highly radioactive hull was later taken to Pearl Harbor and San Francisco for further tests and was finally scuttled off the coast of San Francisco, California, on 29 January 1951. "This ship is an evocative artifact of the dawn of the atomic age, when we began to learn the nature of the genie we'd uncorked from the bottle," says James Delgado. "It speaks to the 'Greatest Generation' -- people's fathers, grandfathers, uncles and brothers who served on these ships, who flew off those decks and what they did to turn the tide in the Pacific war."

Delgado says he doesn't know how many drums of radioactive material are buried within the ship -- perhaps a few hundred. But he is doubtful that they pose any health or environmental risk. The barrels were filled with concrete and sealed in the ship's engine and boiler rooms, which were protected by thick walls of steel. The carrier itself was clearly "hot" when it went down and and it was packed full of fresh fission products and other radiological waste at the time it sank. The Independence was scuttled in what is now the Gulf of the Farallones sanctuary, a haven for wildlife, from white sharks to elephant seals and whales. Despite its history as a dumping ground Richard Charter says the radioactive waste is a relic of a dark age before the environmental movement took hold. "It's just one of those things that humans rather stupidly did in the past that we can't retroactively fix."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Saturday April 18 2015, @01:32AM

    by kaszz (4211) on Saturday April 18 2015, @01:32AM (#172257) Journal

    So should the aircraft carrier be taken up and be chopped or melted and sent to Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository?

    I suspect those nuclear subs and nukes that various countries has left to rust on the bottom of the sea presents a larger danger to the environment. If Kursk could be retrieved these other seafloor objects shouldn't be a big problem?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Reziac on Saturday April 18 2015, @02:38AM

    by Reziac (2489) on Saturday April 18 2015, @02:38AM (#172267) Homepage

    My thought was that more often than not you're as well to leave shit alone rather than trying to move it, since chopping it into manageable pieces is far more likely to release ungoodies than is just leaving it to be covered with ocean debris.

    --
    And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday April 18 2015, @11:22AM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday April 18 2015, @11:22AM (#172358) Homepage
      Well there is the old approach of deliberately scuttling on a remote island's beach. (Google images search is failing me, but I have seen one beach, possibly in India, where there were literally hundreds of such dumped vessels, presumably sold for scrap metal.)
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 1) by deadstick on Saturday April 18 2015, @02:05PM

        by deadstick (5110) on Saturday April 18 2015, @02:05PM (#172407)

        First, it's impossible to scuttle a ship on a beach. Scuttling means deliberately sinking; those ships are beached.

        Second, you're probably referring to the ship-breakers' yards in India or Bangladesh. Those ships aren't "dumped": they've been sold to a ship breaker and delivered to a beach where thousands of poverty-wage workers take them apart under appallingly toxic and dangerous conditions...the steel eventually winds up in new ships.

        • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Saturday April 18 2015, @02:09PM

          by Grishnakh (2831) on Saturday April 18 2015, @02:09PM (#172408)

          They should raise the Independence and properly dispose of her and the radioactive waste. Obviously, this is also an appallingly toxic and dangerous job, which is why I volunteer the US Congress for the job. Let's throw the Supreme Court justices in there too, since they also haven't done any decent work in a long time.

        • (Score: 2) by Nuke on Sunday April 19 2015, @09:45AM

          by Nuke (3162) on Sunday April 19 2015, @09:45AM (#172782)
          If you just run a ship onto a beach, it is likely to float off again at the next higher tide or storm. You need to open some valves or cut holes to let the sea in - that is scuttling.

          thousands of poverty-wage workers ... under appallingly toxic and dangerous conditions

          WTF have working conditions in India got to do with this topic?

          the steel eventually winds up in new ships

          More likely your next car.