Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday April 19 2015, @12:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the sometimes-you-DO-have-a-nail dept.

The journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology announced in a February editorial that researchers who submit studies for publication would not be allowed to use common statistical methods, including p-values. While p-values are routinely misused in scientific literature, many researchers who understand its proper role are upset about the ban. Biostatistician Steven Goodman said, "This might be a case in which the cure is worse than the disease. The goal should be the intelligent use of statistics. If the journal is going to take away a tool, however misused, they need to substitute it with something more meaningful."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Snotnose on Sunday April 19 2015, @03:11PM

    by Snotnose (1623) on Sunday April 19 2015, @03:11PM (#172846)

    We don't understand these and don't want to bother learning, so you can't use them.

    / got a BA in Applied Math
    // Some 35 years ago
    /// I can barely add nowdays

    --
    When the dust settled America realized it was saved by a porn star.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by nitehawk214 on Sunday April 19 2015, @07:04PM

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Sunday April 19 2015, @07:04PM (#172900)

    Try adding numbers instead.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh