Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday April 19 2015, @06:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the with-all-this-logging-we-need-a-lumberjack dept.

World-renowned Unix master Chris Siebenmann has written an article entitled 'I wish systemd would get over its thing about syslog'. It addresses the strained relationship between the systemd init system and the traditional syslog approach to logging used on many Linux systems.

Chris writes:

Anyone who works with systemd soon comes to realize that systemd just doesn't like syslog very much. In fact systemd is so unhappy with syslog that it invented its own logging mechanism (in the form of journald). This is not news. What people who don't have to look deeply into the situation often don't realize is that systemd's dislike is sufficiently deep that systemd just doesn't interact very well with syslog.

This is a must-read article for anyone who needs to use systemd and syslog together.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Marand on Monday April 20 2015, @02:02AM

    by Marand (1081) on Monday April 20 2015, @02:02AM (#172994) Journal

    TL;DR for anyone that doesn't want to read Poettering's entire comment:

    Poettering's reply, as usual, is "not a bug, someone else's problem" and passes blame to another party. Now, to be fair, it's possible that it's true in this case; I'm not able to verify it either way, so I make no assumption about it. It's just hard to take the comment seriously when that's his and Sievers' response to any sort of criticism.

    Journal corruption issue? RESOLVED NOTABUG. systemd causes machine to not boot if kernel is run with 'debug' option? Fix your kernel not our problem. Etc. I'm sure they're occasionally correct and a problem really isn't their fault, but it seems to be their default method of deflecting criticism. (Sometimes they get creative and go for something like "you just hate handicapped people", though)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Informative=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by mvdwege on Monday April 20 2015, @07:34PM

    by mvdwege (3388) on Monday April 20 2015, @07:34PM (#173250)

    Actually, the kernel 'debug' option was hashed out after Linus' first tirade at Kay Sievers. It was in fact admitted by Linux that systemd had correctly interpreted the 'debug' option, but was generating too much output for the kernel log buffer, which was admitted by Lennart to be a bug in systemd and fixed.

    • (Score: 2) by Marand on Monday April 20 2015, @11:28PM

      by Marand (1081) on Monday April 20 2015, @11:28PM (#173322) Journal

      You deserve an Informative mod, but my points haven't refreshed yet, unfortunately. I lost track of the kernel debug discussion somewhere between Sievers claiming no fault and Poettering admitting they actually did do something wrong, so I didn't know one of them admitted error about something. Last thing I saw about it, the kernel devs were discussing ways to suppress notification spam because Sievers was being difficult.

      Sievers' part of that is what was relevant to the point I was making: they always seem to default to "it's not our fault, we did nothing wrong", not just with systemd, but with everything. It's been the same thing for years, all the way back to the creation of, and problems with, pulseaudio. When you cry "wolf" often, nobody will believe you when it's legitimate.