Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday April 20 2015, @03:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the better-living-through-racing dept.

Shell is funding Gordon Murray Design (designer for 3 McLaren F1 championship wins and also the F1 supercar) and engine specialists Geo Technology with Osamu Goto (ex-Honda F1 engines) to build a city car prototype by the end of the year. It will be interesting to see if they are able to bring the un-obtanium technology of F1 to a super mileage small city car--at an affordable price.

Shell has a long history of funding Economy Runs (first informal event in 1939) and Eco-marathon engineering competitions.

Murray has already done the T25 concept city car with central driver's seat. (Caution -- Flash-heavy and ego-heavy(!) site. Murray may be a design genius, but he wants to make sure that you know this...)

From the article:

One billion reasons why car technology has got to get better

Imagine twice as many people moving around your city. What would that mean for you getting to where you need to be? More traffic, more pollution, less space to move around. There are an estimated one billion cars on our roads right now and the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts this will have doubled by 2050.

While alternatives, including electric vehicles, have an increasing role in meeting this demand, experts predict that we will still be relying on fossil fuels to power our vehicles for decades to come. This means we need to think of more innovative ways to move people and goods around. We need to consider how we could make the conventional internal combustion engine work more efficiently, while emitting less CO2, and we need to explore how we can put this into action using existing and readily available infrastructures.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Rich on Monday April 20 2015, @06:32PM

    by Rich (945) on Monday April 20 2015, @06:32PM (#173223) Journal

    There's a hard limit of about 2.50m car length for parking sideways. The fattened up Smarts (2007 onward; Gen 2 and Gen 3) don't cut it with their 2.70m. The Toyota IQ at 3m has never been in the contest. The Murray T25/T27 (2.40m) are nowhere to be seen (but are said to have been sold to an undisclosed manufacturer).

    So what are the options for downtown use & efficient parking? Reliability-wise, the Gen 1 Smarts are probably the second worst shitcans Mercedes has ever designed (FWD V-Class taking the lead), but as a tool for urban traffic nothing else comes even close. Take one of them to the restoration workshop - or spend the same money on buying a Jag XJ and hiring a chauffeur to work around the parking problem?

    And what's the role of Shell here, anyway? Anti-E-Car propaganda? Saving the fossil fuel market? Get the T25 into production? Or avoid that, and especially avoid that the (E-)T27 will ever be built? I have the impression that Shell is not aiming at getting a mass production line running here. (Well, if they would, at least the Honda guy will make sure it gets a decent engine; the T25 prototypes had the Smart engine ...)