Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday April 20 2015, @11:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the gender-equality dept.

A Chemistry World article summarizes a study by Cornell University psychologists Wendy Williams and Stephen Ceci finding that faculty members asked to evaluate hypothetical male and female applicants for assistant professorships in biology, engineering, economics, and psychology gave preference to female applicants. Quoting the study:

The underrepresentation of women in academic science is typically attributed, both in scientific literature and in the media, to sexist hiring. Here we report five hiring experiments in which faculty evaluated hypothetical female and male applicants, using systematically varied profiles disguising identical scholarship, for assistant professorships in biology, engineering, economics, and psychology. Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced), with the exception of male economists, who showed no gender preference. Comparing different lifestyles revealed that women preferred divorced mothers to married fathers and that men preferred mothers who took parental leaves to mothers who did not. Our findings, supported by real-world academic hiring data, suggest advantages for women launching academic science careers.

The article concludes:

To be hired, women must first apply and the authors question whether ‘omniprescent and discouraging’ messages about sexism in academic appointments makes them reluctant to do so.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 21 2015, @12:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 21 2015, @12:58PM (#173498)

    > "This follows the observation of John Stuart Mill, who said: While it is not true that all conservatives are stupid, it is true that all stupid people are conservative." Smart dude, that.

    Really? Because I've known some incredibly stupid liberals, about as many as I've known incredibly stupid conservatives. And a line like that makes me think I'm seeing another one. Wow, it's almost like the two-party system has corroded political discourse to the point where we characterize our opponent as subhuman. How's it going now? Liberals are where all the filthy Jews go, while the conservatives are where all the filthy Christians go?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 21 2015, @01:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 21 2015, @01:44PM (#173521)

    What's a poor fiscally responsible, atheist, non-judgemental vegetarian to do? While I really like the libertarian message of respecting civil liberties, it seems they only care about the second amendment. While I'm all for freedom of speech, it seems like people only want to protect their own speech. I'm for selectively raising taxes on the wealthy through closing of loopholes, but I also favor streamlining the tax code to make it simpler and easier. I also think that the path to prosperity for America is through using economists to find out the programs that are delivering the most bang for the buck for most Americans and cutting those that just aren't working. Hell it's like no country can survive when it's run by a sound byte culture. Also veterans...almost forgot. Free healthcare anywhere, forever. You walk in with you vet ID and you're taken care of. Period. Enough treating our vets like second class citizens when they've given so much.