Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday April 21 2015, @05:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the dr-jekyll-or-mr-hyde dept.

Under Steve Ballmer's reign, Microsoft Open Technologies was founded as a subsidiary of Microsoft. It is now being shut down and folded into Microsoft under Satya Nadella. The subsidiary, staffed with an interoperability strategy team tasked with extending Redmond's open source initiatives, will be embraced back into into the mainstream of the company.

MS Open Tech's president Jean Paoli said "It's now time for MS Open Tech to rejoin Microsoft Corp., and help the company take its next steps in deepening its engagement with open source and open standards." Some claim that a separate subsidiary is no longer needed. Microsoft could easily be the world's biggest vendor of open source software, which is probably one reason some people don't like the term...

Paoli goes on to say:

Team members will play a broader role in the open advocacy mission with teams across the company," he said. "The Programs Office will scale the learnings and practices in working with open source and open standards that have been developed in MS Open Tech across the whole company. Additionally, the Microsoft Open Technology Programs Office will provide tools and services to help Microsoft teams and engineers engage directly with open source communities, create successful Microsoft open source projects, and streamline the process of accepting community contributions into Microsoft open source projects."

Roy Schestowitz at TechRights has a different view of MSFT's recent actions:

"Not much as changed except pretense (face change).

Microsoft dumps its proxy (misleadingly named 'Open Tech') and other attacks on Free software persist from the inside, often through so-called 'experts' whose agenda is to sell proprietary software

Microsoft's long-term assault on GNU/Linux is in some ways worse than ever before. Changing Ballmer's face with another is about as effective as swapping Bush for Obama. Things are only getting worse, even if it's branded differently. The attacks on users' rights (DRM, blobs, spying) have exacerbated. It's just not as visible as before (like the infamous "Get the Facts" marketing campaign), it's more subtle or altogether covert.

There are concrete sign of Microsoft's strategy to destroy FOSS from the inside (entryism) not quite succeeding, which leads to a Plan B, like infecting Android with proprietary spyware, controlling GNU/Linux through Azure, etc.

"For Microsoft, "Open Tech" shutting down is somewhat symbolic, even poetic.""So," some people ask, "what's new at the 'new' Microsoft?"

There's nothing new except worsening levels of aggression.

So how should this new move be viewed?

Is Microsoft bringing the subsidiary in-house to more fully integrate open source in view of a challenging market landscape, or are they surreptitiously trying to take down the open source world from within, using their old tactics?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by tibman on Tuesday April 21 2015, @07:55PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 21 2015, @07:55PM (#173643)

    Long enough for old employees to retire and now have a completely new culture, yes. Good or bad, i can't say. But 30 years is long enough to become a different company.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Disagree=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 21 2015, @08:40PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 21 2015, @08:40PM (#173664)

    ...if M$ had started 30 years ago--maybe.
    ...and they had put completely new people in charge.
    You don't have a proper appreciation for inertia.

    -- gewg_

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by FatPhil on Tuesday April 21 2015, @09:51PM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Tuesday April 21 2015, @09:51PM (#173695) Homepage
    Erm, but this was 11 years ago, not 30: http://windowsitpro.com/systems-management/microsoft-get-facts-about-linux-06-jan-2004
    And this was only 7 years ago, not 30: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071115212848719
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by tibman on Tuesday April 21 2015, @10:27PM

      by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 21 2015, @10:27PM (#173718)

      Last month i forked and built significant portions of their web stack. Does that mean MS doesn't still do evil stuff? heck no. But it's a step in the right direction. It looks like the next version will run on linux as well. Which is great news for companies who want to migrate from windows servers to linux ones. Or for companies who want to have one codebase that is deployable to a diverse OS production environment.

      --
      SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.