Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday April 22 2015, @12:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the take-back-the-internet dept.

During an outbreak of common sense in a Hamburg, Germany, court it was ruled that.. no, advertisers don't get their own way every time.

Zeit Online GmbH and Handelsblatt GmbH as representatives of the advertising world filed suit against Eyeo GmbH (the owners of AdBlock Plus) claiming that the latter should not be allowed to distribute software (a browser plugin that blocks ads) that disrupts their income stream.

The court did not look favourably on the advertisers' case.

From an article in The Register :

Ben Williams, a director of Eyeo, wrote in a blog: "The Hamburg court decision is an important one, because it sets a precedent that may help us avoid additional lawsuits and expenses defending what we feel is an obvious consumer right: giving people the ability to control their own screens by letting them block annoying ads and protect their privacy."

This has ramifications for another simmering case in neighboring France.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by acharax on Wednesday April 22 2015, @05:00PM

    by acharax (4264) on Wednesday April 22 2015, @05:00PM (#174050)

    Tracking isn't the only real issue with ads, ad firms are prime vectors for driveby malware installs and have been so for a very, very long time because they don't care what gets distributed through their networks (and refusing to be held responsible for any resulting damages) as long as they get paid enough, which is a much bigger threat at the end of the day as far as I see it.

    I don't believe for a second most of these firms have any real review process, and if they do, allot more than one or two interns to the task of briefly skimming over 1000 or so submissions. Hell, it'd be very easy to curtail most of this by returning to simple unobtrusive text and banner ads, but serving active content is much, much more lucrative because those ads are harder for the average Joe to ignore.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=4, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Thursday April 23 2015, @06:40AM

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Thursday April 23 2015, @06:40AM (#174202) Homepage Journal

    Isn't it a crime to distribute malware?

    So you could have ClamAV look over all your ads, then if it finds some malware it files an automated report with CERT.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]