Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 23 2015, @03:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the who's-the-good-guy dept.

Newsmax reports that according to according to KRC Research about 64 percent of Americans familiar with Snowden hold a negative opinion of him. However 56 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 have a positive opinion of Snowden which contrasts sharply with older age cohorts. Among those aged 35-44, some 34 percent have positive attitudes toward him. For the 45-54 age cohort, the figure is 28 percent, and it drops to 26 percent among Americans over age 55, U.S. News reported. Americans overall say by plurality that Snowden has done “more to hurt” U.S. national security (43 percent) than help it (20 percent). A similar breakdown was seen with views on whether Snowden helped or hurt efforts to combat terrorism, though the numbers flip on whether his actions will lead to greater privacy protections. “The broad support for Edward Snowden among Millennials around the world should be a message to democratic countries that change is coming,” says Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “They are a generation of digital natives who don’t want government agencies tracking them online or collecting data about their phone calls.” Opinions of millennials are particularly significant in light of January 2015 findings by the U.S. Census Bureau that they are projected to surpass the baby-boom generation as the United States’ largest living generation this year.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 23 2015, @07:34PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 23 2015, @07:34PM (#174409)

    He pointed out that there were no empty spots at the bar and he forced his way between two people talking.

    Secondly, how can a generation be derided for not having any sense of manners in the same breath that they are derided for responding to someone else's bad manners?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Touché=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by DECbot on Thursday April 23 2015, @08:06PM

    by DECbot (832) on Thursday April 23 2015, @08:06PM (#174418) Journal

    That's a good way to put it. I think the proper manners in this scenario would be to to interject an "excuse me," which would queue the women to stance closer together so the gap at the bar is behind one of the women instead of between them. Better yet, it is common practice to create a gap when you are at a crowded bar and see another patron approach the bar, so the person approaching has a place to order a drink without having to interrupt your conversation. Even if you don't create the gap, staring incredulously is far from the proper response and demanding the staff to kick somebody out because a guy edged himself to the bar in the middle of your conversation just to order a drink, and happened to say something rude about your rude stares, is outright ridiculous.

    --
    cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 23 2015, @11:36PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 23 2015, @11:36PM (#174477)

      > because a guy edged himself to the bar in the middle of your conversation just to order a drink,
      > and happened to say something rude about your rude stares

      And that is the point in the story at which his version of events diverges from everyone else's.
      At the barest minimum he was drunk off his ass and his comments weren't limited to just one expertly delivered line.
      I'd say there is a more than fair chance that he put his hands on one or both of them at some point.