It's election season in the UK, and the Green Party's policy document has been coming under scrutiny recently. In it is a desire to reduce copyright term to 14 years (not life + 14 years, but 14 years from publication).
Unsurprisingly, this has received a bit of a backlash from various parties.
There's no chance the Green Party will form the next government, so this is all academic, but is this a sensible idea? Are people overreacting?
(Score: 5, Insightful) by WillR on Friday April 24 2015, @02:52PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 24 2015, @03:15PM
1710. What was the average lifespan back then about half of what it is now?
(Score: 2) by wantkitteh on Friday April 24 2015, @03:57PM
With a 14-year term, the first Harry Potter film would be due out of copyright in 6 months. I was going to say "The Fast And The Furious franchise would have missed out out-living the copyright on the original by weeks", but who knows how many more will splutter out of the pipeline before they finally stop making them?
(Score: 3, Interesting) by wantkitteh on Friday April 24 2015, @04:03PM
...oh, and the whole F&F franchise has a total production budget so far of $844m, it's made $3.5b box so far. I don't think the argument that Hollywood will fall apart if the copyright terms are reduced holds a single drop of water. Couldn't say about other content producers though.
(Score: 2) by AndyTheAbsurd on Friday April 24 2015, @04:57PM
I just saw something on Facebook saying that Vin Diesel announced something about "Furious 8", so at least one more. (Also what the hell is up with the naming of those movies? I don't mind a little inconsistency but that series is getting ridiculous about it.) On the other hand, agreeing to be in another F&F movie is what got Vin Diesel the rights to the character of Riddick, so hopefully he'll use what he makes off the current and next F&F to make another one of those that *actually* resolves *something* in that universe.
Please note my username before responding. You may have been trolled.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 24 2015, @06:19PM
Vin Diesel made F&F 7 so we could make a deal on his pet project Hannibal The Conqueror. So we might see htc before the next Riddick.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 24 2015, @03:59PM
~36 [ourworldindata.org]
(Score: 4, Informative) by choose another one on Friday April 24 2015, @04:18PM
Life expectancy gives a misleading impression because it is (was) heavily skewed by high infant and child mortality.
For instance in medieval Britain life expectancy _at_ _birth_ was about 30 - less than half what it is now. However, if you reached the age of 21 (and might be publishing something) then male life expectancy was over 60. By 1700s it would be likely have been higher still, definitely a lot more than half what it is now.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 24 2015, @06:29PM
So for all we have spent on the medical field all we got was much fewer dead babies and 15 years to enjoy arthritis and altimeters?
On the low end it is fantastic. On the high end, as someone who has taken care of relatives lingering on for as much as 20 years past what could be considered a life worth living, I am not at all prepared for those "benefits".
(Score: 2) by Joe Desertrat on Saturday April 25 2015, @02:07AM
So for all we have spent on the medical field all we got was much fewer dead babies and 15 years to enjoy arthritis and altimeters?
To be fair, it is kind of fun seeing how high up you have climbed.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 24 2015, @04:59PM
Most popular movies make a fair bit of their money in a few months. 14 years is plenty of time.
Furthermore 14 years puts more pressure on software companies like Microsoft to make stuff that's actually better than their old stuff rather than shit out whatever crap they have.
As for those in the music industry, having copyright at 14 years will probably weaken the labels, which is likely a good thing for performers and musicians.