Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Sunday April 26 2015, @01:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the denial-is-a-river-in-egypt dept.

So, it has come to this! Universities are now offering courses on how to argue against climate change denialists! (Note, even mentioning such courses could be illegal in Florida, but fortunately this is in Australia.)

Starting 28 April, 2015, the University of Queensland is offering a free Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) aimed at “Making Sense of Climate Science Denial”.

You know you've made it when they start teaching about you in college! Well done, climate change deniers!!!
And a MOOC? Hmmm, is there a "certificate" one might earn?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 26 2015, @04:22PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 26 2015, @04:22PM (#175364)

    You mean they have a course on how to be a specific kind of dick?

    What a waste of money. "but it is free". No it is not. There are servers and peoples time involved. Time is money.

    Taking a debating class is good. Taking one just so you know how to specifically argue 1 point, not good, and a waste of your time.

    Most people on the internet who 'debate' are actually *really* bad at it. Remove 1 tool from their arsenal and they wither at any sort of real points. Remove google from their quiver and they have no idea what to argue much less how. Many people confuse being able to google something up as debating. No that is searching and reusing other peoples arguments to puff up your ego. "climate debate" usually falls into this realm. Everyone can talk about the weather. As it is easy to see and measure the 'right now'. But most people are not climate scientists and defer to them. When someone asks 'what if they are wrong' they get labeled with a broad brush of 'denier'.

  • (Score: 2) by fritsd on Sunday April 26 2015, @04:50PM

    by fritsd (4586) on Sunday April 26 2015, @04:50PM (#175374) Journal

    You mean they have a course on how to be a specific kind of dick?

    No.

    A chemist can follow a course on pharmacochemistry, that doesn't make it a course on "how to poison people".

    A physicist can follow a course on ballistics, that doesn't make it a course on "how to shoot people".

    And a psychologist can follow a course on climate change denialism as a social/psychological phenomenon, that doesn't make it a course on "how to be a specific kind of dick".

    I bet there are also theology courses on the Bhagwan [wikipedia.org] or on Lou de Palingboer [wikipedia.org], that doesn't make it a course on "how to be a rich and sexually gratified religious leader". Hm.. maybe that topic needs further study...

    I think this exemplifies the distinction between a university and a technical highschool: a university also teaches those subjects that are not of immediate or obvious use, like molecular quantum chemistry or cosmology or philology.