Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Sunday April 26 2015, @01:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the denial-is-a-river-in-egypt dept.

So, it has come to this! Universities are now offering courses on how to argue against climate change denialists! (Note, even mentioning such courses could be illegal in Florida, but fortunately this is in Australia.)

Starting 28 April, 2015, the University of Queensland is offering a free Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) aimed at “Making Sense of Climate Science Denial”.

You know you've made it when they start teaching about you in college! Well done, climate change deniers!!!
And a MOOC? Hmmm, is there a "certificate" one might earn?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 27 2015, @08:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 27 2015, @08:51PM (#175861)

    No need for a certificate here - as we have no shortage of wallpaper or toilet paper. This course is another desperate attempt by those with a Lib agenda to push their anti-religion religion under the guise of 'education'.
    For those of you having something better to do with the next 10 minutes of your life, you can bypass MOOC and the pseudo-intellectuals and print up your very own 'certificate': http://www.cynicalbastards.com/ubs/ [cynicalbastards.com] ... I now have a PhD in Theoretic Climatology and Basketweaving.

  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday April 27 2015, @09:08PM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Monday April 27 2015, @09:08PM (#175865) Journal

    So if I understand you, all certificates are the same? That doesn't seem quite right. Perhaps, however, it lets me understand the climate change denier mindset a bit better. Climate scientists have a degree, and now you have a certificate. Climate scientists have an "opinion", and you have one too! Therefore, your opinion is just as good as the climate scientists! Praise God!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 28 2015, @12:56AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 28 2015, @12:56AM (#175913)

      Your appeals to authority mean nothing until your precious authorities can provide something verifiable to back up their claims. You know, just as expected with actual science and not Orwellian newspeak "science because we say it is science even though it is not testable nor repeatable nor verifiable".

      • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Tuesday April 28 2015, @01:33AM

        by aristarchus (2645) on Tuesday April 28 2015, @01:33AM (#175922) Journal

        Your appeals to authority mean nothing until your precious authorities can provide something verifiable to back up their claims.

        Quite. But seriously, "my precious"? I am not citing the Pope or Brittany Spears here! But please, a bit of reflection: the deniers have even less in the way of authority, which as you point out is not necessarily a bad thing, but they also have no science, no data, no serious theory, no testable hypotheses or repeatable experimental designs.
          Deniers appeal not to authority, but to nothing, the famed argumentum ad ignorantiam or appeal to ignorance. "Since we don't know for sure, definitively, that Anthropogenic Global Warming is true, we can just assume it is not." I guess we will just have to "teach the controversy" here at Soylent University, at least until there is proof one way or the other..

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 28 2015, @10:39AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 28 2015, @10:39AM (#176005)

          Sorry, the "climate deniers" (a propaganda term used to equate people to holocaust deniers) do not need to prove a negative. All that is necessary is to point to models used by "man-made climate change" advocates and notice that years later the new historical data does not match the predicted results.