Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Sunday April 26 2015, @09:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the great-ai-bluff dept.

Stephen Jordan reports at the National Monitor that four of the world's greatest poker players are going into battle against a computer program that researchers are calling Claudico in the "Brains Vs. Artificial Intelligence" competition at Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh. The pros — Doug Polk, Dong Kim, Bjorn Li and Jason Les — will receive appearance fees derived from a prize purse of $100,000 donated by Microsoft Research and by Rivers Casino. Claudico, the first machine program to play heads-up no-limit Texas Hold'em against top human players, will play nearly 20,000 hands with each human poker player over the next two weeks. "Poker is now a benchmark for artificial intelligence research, just as chess once was. It's a game of exceeding complexity that requires a machine to make decisions based on incomplete and often misleading information, thanks to bluffing, slow play and other decoys," says Tuomas Sandholm, developer of the program. "And to win, the machine has to out-smart its human opponents." In total, that will be 1,500 hands played per day until May 8, with just one day off to allow the real-life players to rest.

An earlier version of the software called Tartanian 7 [PDF] was successful in winning the heads-up, no-limit Texas Hold'em category against other computers in July, but Sandholm says that does not necessarily mean it will be able to defeat a human in the complex game. "I think it's a 50-50 proposition," says Sandholm. "My strategy will change more so than when playing against human players," says competitor Doug Polk, widely considered the world's best player of Heads-Up No-Limit Texas Hold'em, with total live tournament earnings of more than $3.6 million. "I think there will be less hand reading so to speak, and less mind games. In some ways I think it will be nice as I can focus on playing a more pure game, and not have to worry about if he thinks that I think, etc."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Monday April 27 2015, @12:30PM

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 27 2015, @12:30PM (#175669) Homepage Journal

    There's a very simple game that shares some of the properties of poker, when it comes to machine playing.

    Two players, E and O.
    They each choose whether the turn a penny heads up or tails up.
    They reveal their pennies.
    If they are the same, E wins. If different, O wins.

    Optimal play against an optimal opponent (the kind studied in game theory) is to be random, with equal probability of heads and tails.

    But playing against a human, who chooses instead of flipping a coin, the computer can do better. It has a distinct edge in that it can determine the patterns in the human's attempt to be random. Just keeping track of what the human did after the last time there was a HTHHH sequence (and other such) is enough for a significant edge.

    -- hendrik

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by mtrycz on Monday April 27 2015, @01:30PM

    by mtrycz (60) on Monday April 27 2015, @01:30PM (#175693)

    Obvioulsy, knowing this, the human will just choose to flip the coin. Why shouldn't he?

    --
    In capitalist America, ads view YOU!