Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday April 27 2015, @09:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the lasers-not-just-for-blasters-anymore dept.

City College of New York researchers have manipulated the polarization of a laser beam to create shapes that could boost data transmission rates:

Using special devices called "q-plates," the researchers manipulated a laser beam's polarization into novel shapes some of which Milione referred to as "radial" and "azimuthal." "While light's polarization (linear and circular) is used for many modern technologies, such as, 3D television, its shape is often left untouched," he said.

The researchers showed that each shape could carry an additional data stream. While the researchers used only four shapes, in principal, the number that can be used is unlimited. "The amount of data that can be transmitted on a single laser beam can be scaled to terabits or even petabits," said Alfano. "This technology is potentially compatible with building to building communication in NYC or even between Google data centers."

The research is published in Optics Letters [abstract].

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by VLM on Monday April 27 2015, @09:58PM

    by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 27 2015, @09:58PM (#175877)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_mode_dispersion [wikipedia.org]

    For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction, sorta.

    Just like different wavelengths travel at different speeds in fiber spreading pulses, so do different polarizations.

    It will none the less add some capacity of course.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by c0lo on Monday April 27 2015, @11:50PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 27 2015, @11:50PM (#175900) Journal
    Different propagation speeds may be less of a problem that one may think, if one uses different polarizations for different communication channels - in this case one only need to have a guaranteed constant signal speed any polarization/channel.
    The problem that I'd be afraid is mixing polarizations due to imperfections, which would result in mixing communication channels
    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by coolgopher on Tuesday April 28 2015, @04:00AM

      by coolgopher (1157) on Tuesday April 28 2015, @04:00AM (#175955)

      The problem that I'd be afraid is mixing polarizations due to imperfections, which would result in mixing communication channels

      Yeah, you don't want to cross the streams. That would be bad.

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by TK-421 on Tuesday April 28 2015, @01:57PM

        by TK-421 (3235) on Tuesday April 28 2015, @01:57PM (#176057) Journal

        Yeah, you don't want to cross the streams. That would be bad.

        Tell him about the Twinkie.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bd on Tuesday April 28 2015, @07:48AM

    by bd (2773) on Tuesday April 28 2015, @07:48AM (#175984)

    I'm afraid it will not add capacity for fiber optics communications, as this method only works in free-space data transmission, due to the usage of higher-order transverse modes (you would have to use multi-mode fibers, and those are suspect to an effect called mode dispersion, completely messing up this signal).

    Oh, and it apparently only works over a distance of 1 m, as even the smallest optical table would provide for far more than one meter of propagation length, provided one cleverly uses a bunch of mirrors. I have only read the abstract as I am not at work, but I can only assume they tried and it didn't work.

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday April 29 2015, @03:53PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday April 29 2015, @03:53PM (#176677)

      On top of this, the fiber's capacity usually (99.99..%) isn't the problem in current systems.

      Demuxing a full set of DWDM wavelengths at 25Gb/s each, still takes so much power that adding twice or four times the capacity in the box is a recipe for meltdown. If you have a long-reach link and can't dig to add more fibers, this kind of trick will help in a few years. But for now, most people are much better off adding another fiber and back-end.