Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday April 28 2015, @03:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the elites-with-flawed-data-making-choices dept.

El Reg reports

With digital reaching its audience targets, the government set a 2017 date for the death of analogue FM radio in [Norway].

[...]However, the Norwegian Local Radio Association disputes the communications ministry's figure, pointing instead to Norwegian Government Statistical Bureau data that "listening to DAB radio is presently limited to 19% on a daily basis."

In an e-mail sent to Vulture South [El Reg's Australian operation], the association says the Minister of Culture's announcement swept up DVB-T and Internet radio to claim that "digital listening" had hit the 50 per cent target that triggers an FM switch-off.

The association also notes that an all-DAB nation would provide a lot less service to motoring tourists without digital radios in their cars. "This proposed change means that most visitors will not be able to listen to national channels or public radio for emergency alerts, traffic or other important information", the group said in a media release e-mailed to El Reg. It claims that a focus on large broadcasters would leave FM investments by community radio stranded.

The local broadcasters are backed by the Progress Party, a partner in the coalition government in Norway, [as well as by] the Greens.

Related: Norway to be First Nation to Switch Off National Analog FM Stations

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by ikanreed on Tuesday April 28 2015, @06:17PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 28 2015, @06:17PM (#176186) Journal

    Or... and this is just a hypothetical here, the reasons given in the article are quite reasonable: that (nationally owned) bandwidth is being wasted on 19% of people, when the majority of people have moved on to requesting the actual things they want to listen to instead of listening to whatever the stations see fit to air.

    Reserving huge sections of national resources to suit the needs of a small minority of users is inefficient.

    And you're a conspiratorial nutball who needs to grow up.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday April 28 2015, @06:34PM

    by frojack (1554) on Tuesday April 28 2015, @06:34PM (#176195) Journal

    : that (nationally owned) bandwidth is being wasted on 19% of people,

    Is there a lot of contention for that particular bandwidth in a small country like Norway?
    And when you say "WASTE", what resource is actually depleted?

    87.5 to 108.0 megahertz (EU FM allocation) does not exactly have any significant group clamoring for its re-designation.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Tuesday April 28 2015, @07:50PM

      by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 28 2015, @07:50PM (#176222) Journal

      You mean besides cell phone networks, a thing almost every citizen needs and uses?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 28 2015, @08:04PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 28 2015, @08:04PM (#176230)

        Free to air not in a phone company' vocabulary.

      • (Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday April 28 2015, @11:11PM

        by frojack (1554) on Tuesday April 28 2015, @11:11PM (#176318) Journal

        Well I don't know of a single manufacturer that operates either towers or cell phones in that bandwidth.
        I suppose Norway could build them from the ground up.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 2) by sjames on Wednesday April 29 2015, @02:18AM

        by sjames (2882) on Wednesday April 29 2015, @02:18AM (#176413) Journal

        Definitely not them. That band is practically worthless to them.

  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Tuesday April 28 2015, @06:53PM

    by Bot (3902) on Tuesday April 28 2015, @06:53PM (#176203) Journal

    We'll see the fruit the tree bears.

    --
    Account abandoned.